Google Chrome Operating System

[leinad31]

You want to think that you don't however you sound exactly opposite.
There is very simple explanation for that - you are trying very hard to prove your "innocence"...
Although I wouldn't want to turn this into a personal attack kind of replies.

Best regards.

You already did. Only thing left for you to do is be true to form and click the hazard icon on the left side <<<<<.

I can't help it if that is your impression PRhinoBull. It also can't be helped that MS OS has architectural flaws (http://www.roughlydrafted.com/Oct05.5Flaws.html) but which OS doesn't? At least I was responsible enough to research on the other side of the matter rather than leaving it at just that level of debate then resorting to whatever argument. Taken with a grain of salt (since its a pro Mac site) there are still relevant points raised here http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/Hom...EF7FAFD3A.html.

In addition to what was already mentioned, Google OS will also have to address OEM barrier since target user market is content with a subnotebook that works...they won't be technically savvy enough to consider replacing an OS that already provides what they need, and they already paid for it so why incur additional cost. Also Google OS won't have the luxury of dedicated hardware platform such as with Mac OS. Just like toothbrush and toothpaste they go hand in hand.

Nor does Google have retail experience and channels to sell the OS themselves. As with Microsoft's OEM, their pay per click scheme is a guaranteed gravy train that is addicting to companies but leaves their competence/experience to compete in dynamic consumer markets such as subnotebooks OS uncertain. With smartphones they can simply bundle their mobile OS, but with subnotebooks it is not as simple due to OEM and the element of choice of consumers.

In short it may end up as technically sound/ideal, but non marketable.