Security Or Flexibility?

[Atheist]

And thats the point of this thread, variations of opinions. You see that its worth to use huge resources to provide somethings like "searchable Start menu", while I don't.

I dont get it, this thread was supposed to be about security vs flexibility, but it seems to be more focused about how Vista was designed. Now you have begun comparing Resource usage versus functionallity.

As I said in the OP: "Note #2: This thread is for telling your opinion, not for proving that I'm wrong."
I said that because I don't want posters to get out from the original target and get in an "Infinite Loop". Because some times, people can't see what they don't want to see.

Thats the problem, there original post's target was mainly focused on discussing Vista's flaws. It is unevitable that the responses will touch this subject aswell.

if UAC can be disabled, thats dosn't eliminate "Bad Design".
many people called Vista as "Annoying OS" because of its UAC.
UAC may not the biggest problem, but it is "The straw that broke the camel's back".
Thank's

But is not that flexibility in itself? Being able to turn it off I mean.