Okay, I totally agree with that. My concern with ChatGPT, as I think I have stated earlier, possibly in another thread, is this: When you have a sufficiently advanced AI, how will you know when what it says should be believed? With ChatGPT as it currently stands, this isn't a problem. It makes so many mistakes with simple factual things that everybody is well aware that what it states on subjects they don't know about, should be thoroughly checked. A guideline, but not a given truth.

If we get much better, such that it doesn't make mistakes with readily verified points, like that mistake Bard made quite publicly, will we put too much trust in statements it makes that we can't verify?

I could tell you what the weather will be on June 3rd of this year, for whatever point you are at. I'd have some slight chance of being right, and a pretty good chance of being wrong, and everybody knows it. But, if I were to be right about what the weather will be next Tuesday, and were right about it a dozen times in a row, then you might start believing me when I predict what it will be on June 3rd...and that prediction would STILL be total crap.