|
-
Apr 15th, 2021, 12:02 AM
#10
Lively Member
Re: TwinBasic
 Originally Posted by SearchingDataOnly
I tested twinBasic and it is really exciting.
It's of course a good thing to see that twinBasic has added some new language features. But I'm thinking about a question:
twinBasic has its own Basic language features (mainly similar to VB.NET), then Olaf's VB.Next will also have its own Basic language features, and RadBasic will also have its own Basic language features.
If this is the case, then the Basic code accepted by these three compilers cannot be unified. Maybe we should have a Basic standardization organization like ECMAScript.
A good idea but actually it is not practical as there are a huge number of Basic variants in the market.
--
From,
Indic Software

Revolutionary Visual Programming IDE.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|