My point was that this particular topic has become something of a fact-free emotional sporting event on both sides of the question, so why not let the other side play?
On some of the stuff you've posted, yes. Like I say, I really like the idea of universal health care but I don't believe universal insurance is the same thing and I don't really see either of your parties pulling for what I believe is the right solution.

On other stuff, maybe. I honestly don't know enough to either support or deny your claims about Pelosi's corruption. I want to have more of a look into that but haven't had time yet. It sure wouldn't surprise me to find out that a politician (of either political leaning) is lining their (and their friends') nest but it also wouldn't surprise me to find that a politician simply proposed what they thought they could pass and the other side chose to miss-represent it as something it's not. Definitely something worth finding out about.

On Chloroquine and the science around it, hell no. The credible scientific is in complete agreement that there's no evidence it does a damn thing (which is not the same as there being evidence it does nothing) and I haven't seen anyone claiming it does whose agenda was anything other than purely political.

This article is about blood clotting due to the virus. If you are not aware of it you should read it.
It's behind a pay wall so didn't read it. It sounds like what Dil posted in post 633. Is it something different?