What if there was a NEW vb6

[Schmidt]

I don't care. I only care that you deliberately mislead people because of your own broken hearts.

As for "broken hearts" - I can ensure you, that it's mostly technical reasons, why I prefer VB6
(native compilation, deterministic behaviour of the lifetime of Class-instances, fast IDE,
fast compile-times, compiled Apps deployable from XP to Win10 unchanged and with
relative low footprint - even as portable Apps (using regfree COM).

So, when I tell you (again), that a clean, well-structured code-base is only a question
of ones own professionalism, not dependent on the tool one is using - and doable
with the VB6-compiler and -IDE quite fine - how on earth is that "misleading people"?

But please don't come here to slander .Net to feed your own vicious need for some kind of feeling of revenge.

What the... - where on earth did I "slander .NET" - what I said was:
"Don't blame the tool for your own shortcomings".

Over in the VB6-forum you recently give me replies as:
"Oh, nice - didn't know that" (along with Rep-points) -
and now I'm suddenly "misleading Newbies"?

I can only repeat - in case you switched at a still lower level (on your own VB6-learning-curve)
to a different language (how else shall I interpret your comments on my posts over there),
then why selling this, let's say - "early abortion in mastering a given development-tool"
now as "failure of the tool itself"?

Olaf