|
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 05:17 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
Today's ***?
CNN Story: Girls made to show underwear at school dance
***? Since when is undergarmets (or lack thereof) to be mandated by public schools? Next thing you know, public schools will be demanding that girls shave their legs, underarms, and that they don't shave their crotch. ***?
There are lots of stupid people out there. It is obvious that firing this AP and suing her into a debtors prision isn't enough to solve the problem.
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 05:26 PM
#2
Frenzied Member
How the hell do these things actually happen and noone stops and says "hey hang on, isn't this a f***ing stupid idea that's going to get us all fired?" This is one of those 'get off my planet, now' situations.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 05:27 PM
#3
Frenzied Member
Welcome to Prom! After your full body cavity search, urine test, and undergarmet checks, please HAVE FUN! 
retired member. Thanks for everything
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 05:30 PM
#4
Originally posted by HarryW
How the hell do these things actually happen and noone stops and says "hey hang on, isn't this a f***ing stupid idea that's going to get us all fired?"
There is a limitless range to human stupidity.
Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.
Take credit, not responsibility
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 06:36 PM
#5
PowerPoster
It's not that they did it that's so bad. It's the public humiliation aspect. What they should have done is hired a professional underwear checker, such as myself, and had the checks take place behind closed doors, such as my apartment. Then it would have been ok.
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 06:37 PM
#6
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 06:40 PM
#7
PowerPoster
Originally posted by markman
you dont have any qualifications 
My qualifications:
* I wear underwear
* I have seen women's underwear in various pictures I regularly download from the internet.
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 06:51 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
I guess that is qualified. The only person more qualified would be someone who wears women's underwear. Oh wait, that's what you said, you wear women's underwear that you order from the internet?
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 06:52 PM
#9
PowerPoster
I like to feel pretty. What's wrong with that?
-
Apr 30th, 2002, 08:42 PM
#10
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by cafeenman
* I have seen women's underwear in various pictures I regularly download from the internet.
Seeing the absence of women's underwear isnt the same as seeing women's underwear
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote