Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: Deaf Baby?

  1. #41
    pathfinder NotLKH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,397
    Originally posted by chrisjk
    When that kid grows up and if/when they find out what happened, it's ganna hate them for it. I would
    Originally posted by thinktank2
    If they were my parents, I would kill them
    Hmm. Interesting.

    I don't condone intentionally arranging a disabled child into being
    born, However, once born, it would seem to be unlikely that such
    a child should regret its life. This child would never have occured
    in any other way, and it would seem to be preferable to live with
    deafness and "loving" parents, than to never have lived at all.

    -Lou

  2. #42
    The Devil crptcblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Quetzalshacatenango
    Posts
    9,091
    One thing people seem to be forgetting is, if the child was never born at all, how could it regret or prefer anything?

    Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.


    Take credit, not responsibility

  3. #43
    Hyperactive Member barrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    My own little world
    Posts
    274
    I have a handicapped son. I did not plan for him to have it but I knew it was a possibility. I knew there was a chance that one of my children could be as my husband has a genetic disease. I doubt very much that my son either hates me for having him or Tom for passing on the disease. I'm sure he'd rather not have it but he doesn't, I don't and Tom doesn't regret his life!!!!!

    I would never wish a handicap on a child and don't condone what these people did but none of you.....even me with my situation....can second guess what the child would feel toward his/her parents for having passed on a defect. If the child is given a good home and loving environment chances are that he would not hate his parents or wish them dead anymore than any other child. It's very easy for all of you to pass judgement.

  4. #44
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    I'm sorry for coming in late on this thread, but I am so confused....

    A lesbian couple has two children. Are these children of natural birth (artificial insemination?) or adopted?

    If they are of birth, what steps did the parents take to try and have deaf children?

    Just reading the initial comments, I thought that two deaf people decided to adopt two deaf children. Which makes perfect sense to me, though I don't see deafness as a "cultural identity". It affects the way in which you percieve the world and adapt to it. Do I have a cultural identity because I'm dizzy?

    I could see signing as being a cultural trait, but you don't have to be deaf to sign.
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  5. #45
    The Devil crptcblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Quetzalshacatenango
    Posts
    9,091
    I think the story goes...

    Two deaf lesbians found a man with a genetic disposition for deafness. One or the other was impregnated(artifically or naturally I don't know) specfically trying to have a deaf child.
    Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.


    Take credit, not responsibility

  6. #46

  7. #47
    The Devil crptcblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Quetzalshacatenango
    Posts
    9,091
    Originally posted by NotLKH

    Hope it wasn't the guy!
    Ouch!

    Hey, if Arnold can do it, anyone can!

    Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.


    Take credit, not responsibility

  8. #48
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    Sorry, the link to the BBC news (which I thought was part of his signature at first) sheds light on the whole thing.

    So this was a "designer baby".

    Well...

    once you allowed couples to have choice over what their baby was like, it was not possible to attack the choices people then made.
    So the question shouldn't be, "was it right for these people to choose to have a deaf child at the loss of all others", but "should any parent be allowed to dictate the criteria a child must meet as part of the conception-to-birth process". This is a huge can of worms that should not have been opened, yet.

    I think this is a moral issue and not an ethical one. As such, the government should not make any attempts to bridge the rights of these parents. It is all or nothing. Either it is unethical to use this technology at all, or it is ethically acceptable. But as to the moral uses of this technology... sorry... that is up to individuals to decide and try to help others make the same decision.

    Just my random thought, take it or leave it.
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width