Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Can I have a little help please?

  1. Apr 6th, 2002, 07:57 AM #1
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204

    Can I have a little help please?

    Hey guys, can you give me a hand here, I need some info to feed my program. Can I have some names, each with a number from 1 - 600 Oh yeah, umm, they need to be champion or novice as well, just put an N or C by the name. Thanks a lot guys

    Vicky


    (PS a wowwypop would also be acceptable )


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Apr 6th, 2002, 07:59 AM #2
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    um what on earth are you trying to do?
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:01 AM #3
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    I'm testing my proggy

    Name - entrant class - ability number - class. There's over 600 classes, and I can't be bothered to put them all on here, so just choose a number


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:03 AM #4
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    what is this abilty number then?
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:06 AM #5
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Oops, that sholdn't have been number, lol. There ar three abilities, Junior, Novice, and Champion. It depends on the expreience you've had with showing, and breeding birds. Thats why I wanted C and N, I've already tested the juniors


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:09 AM #6
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    ok let me try something:

    Mike Parks - 69 - C - 69
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:12 AM #7
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Just take out the last 69, one is enough for now


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:14 AM #8
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221

    i'm still confused with what this is all about
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:16 AM #9
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Don't worry That example was good. Now for a few more


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:17 AM #10
    parksie
    parksie is offline
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    Originally posted by kedaman
    ok let me try something:

    Mike Parks - 69 - C - 69
    Oi LOL

    Kensuke Sugii - 32 - N
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:23 AM #11
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    Originally posted by parksie
    Oi LOL

    Kensuke Sugii - 32 - N
    Hey thats unfair! Me novice?!

    Harry Wilkinson - 123 - N
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:23 AM #12
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Hang on, just give me a name, and a number, from 1 - 600 That'll make life easier


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:34 AM #13
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    well i'll just give you a few more, then someone else will have to continue
    Ben Stappleton - 564
    Ian Saunders - 234
    Jamie Plender - 432
    Ian Baker - 345
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:36 AM #14
    parksie
    parksie is offline
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    Originally posted by kedaman
    Jamie Plender - 432
    Plenderleith
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:37 AM #15
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    Originally posted by parksie
    Plenderleith
    SU P
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:44 AM #16
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Thanks! *mwah* Hmm, only another few hundred to go Lol.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:46 AM #17
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    lol maybe need a name generator?
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. Apr 6th, 2002, 08:55 AM #18
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Yeah


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. Apr 6th, 2002, 09:11 AM #19
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Is anyone else gonna help me? Pwease?


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. Apr 6th, 2002, 09:24 AM #20
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    More names!!! C'mon guys, make some up, In know that you can come up with some good ones


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. Apr 6th, 2002, 09:40 AM #21
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Hello? Hey! Stop ignoring me! *pouts* Please help me!


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. Apr 6th, 2002, 10:04 AM #22
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    1. Tyrone Christner
    2. Lonnie Dauenhauer
    3. Katy Hoos
    4. Lakisha Holness
    5. Tania Rolls
    6. Kurt Geise
    7. Guy Dulmage
    8. Max Thibeau
    9. Earnestine Procter
    10. Darryl Svendsen
    11. Noemi Dimarco
    12. Kurt Dummer
    13. Nelson Minix
    14. Clinton Cueto
    15. Lenore Hulings
    16. Kathrine Califano
    17. Javier Frappier
    18. Edwina Northington
    19. Lance Allie
    20. Melisa Stillings
    21. Max Follis
    22. Zelma Galyon
    23. Lilia Sigel
    24. Selena Victory
    25. Cody Gerardo
    26. Nelson Bengtson
    27. Roxie Erion
    28. Katy Sally
    29. Ted Schooler
    30. Kurt Norby
    you can generate more here
    http://www.kleimo.com/random/name.cfm
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. Apr 6th, 2002, 10:22 AM #23
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Thanks Keddie! You're brilliant!*mwah**mwah**mwah**mwah*


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  26. Apr 6th, 2002, 10:23 AM #24
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    hey i just typed name generator in google
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  27. Apr 6th, 2002, 10:32 AM #25
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Fine! If you don't want my kisses, then give them back!


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  28. Apr 6th, 2002, 10:42 AM #26
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    I didn't say that
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  29. Apr 6th, 2002, 10:47 AM #27
    rinoaheartilly
    rinoaheartilly is offline

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member rinoaheartilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    204
    Ok, here's another one *mwah*


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  30. Apr 6th, 2002, 11:29 AM #28
    Martin Wilson
    Martin Wilson is offline
    Addicted Member Martin Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    :)
    Posts
    236
    1. Fernando Fleitas
    2. Nelson Batdorf
    3. Neil Stolle
    4. Erik Prindle
    5. Cody Spath
    6. Clayton Carron
    7. Julio Bleich
    8. Kurt Peasley
    9. Jessie Ruark
    10. Erik Okane
    11. Jamie Iles
    12. Darren Rappaport
    13. Neil Orona
    14. Hugh Bosque
    15. Guy Goh
    16. Cody Santa
    17. Darryl Calixte
    18. Lonnie Wightman
    19. Julio Ried
    20. Neil Slider
    21. Nelson Varn
    22. Lonnie Piel
    23. Cody Shiner
    24. Jamie Feltmann
    25. Mathew Pixler
    26. Lance Dougan
    27. Kelly Paterno
    28. Kelly Gelb
    29. Kelly Mac
    30. Allan Furlough
    What is the answer to this question?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width