|
-
Jul 27th, 2000, 01:17 AM
#1
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
You could use an collision array along with your map tile array, or you could have an UDT for each Tile containg both collisions and Tile and have a single array of the UDT.
Code:
Type tMap
Tile as byte
Collision as byte
End type
Public Map() as tMap
or
Code:
Public Map() as byte
Public MapCollision() as byte
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Jul 27th, 2000, 12:36 PM
#2
New Member
I am using a flat bmp for the base background, and am only using 32X32(pixel) tiles for sprites. How can I have it check to see if there is a tile with a tag of (lets say) 3, if they want to move up, check above to see if there's a blocking sprite, and the same for any other direction.
If I weren't insane, someone else would be. :-p
Steve
-
Jul 27th, 2000, 02:17 PM
#3
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
What about your sprites then, are they attached to a grids of 32X32 or are they freely placed on the background?
If you have your Sprites independent from the map, you could put them in an array of UDT or using a classmodule
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote