Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 72

Thread: The tables have turned....

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033

    The tables have turned....

    Apparently www.linux64.com, obviously a Linux site, is running Microsoft IIS and has been doing so since August 2001...

    Hmmm...

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/...submit=Examine
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  2. #2
    The Devil crptcblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Quetzalshacatenango
    Posts
    9,091
    That's wicked wild crunchy crazy
    Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.


    Take credit, not responsibility

  3. #3
    Jethro
    Guest
    My god even Linux sites recognise that OS is stoopid

  4. #4

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Jethro
    My god even Linux sites recognise that OS is stoopid
    I actually never thought it was stupid for the business world, I've always defended it for web servers and such.

    You probably know more about it than I do thuogh.

    But that's pretty funny.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  5. #5
    Jethro
    Guest
    Linux is a worry, we have a couple of servers setup cause we got to support the software tools on that platform as well. So far out of a huge client database, only one has implemented a Linux solution....cheap bastards.....


    NT seems to be still behind Unix on the server side of things, except for office tools...

  6. #6
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    So doesnt prove **** all!!

    Proves that perhaps they are getting the site hosted for free but only by IIS servers!
    Or thats what he has at home!

    Look at redhat.com or vbforums.com or google.com etc etc.

  7. #7

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Beacon
    So doesnt prove **** all!!

    Proves that perhaps they are getting the site hosted for free but only by IIS servers!
    Or thats what he has at home!

    Look at redhat.com or vbforums.com or google.com etc etc.
    Whoa chill there Beacon, I was just pointing out that it was funny.

    What he has at home, this is a company I'm sure.

    Yet when MS does it they are grounds for trashing. but it's OK when the world of Linux does it.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  8. #8
    Jethro
    Guest
    Ohh cause Linux is open .... ohhh ..... so every Tom , Dick and Harry can hack it.......


    Linux sucks!


    I can keep this up all day or until Ray hits me with his Linux manual - man that's a big book

  9. #9
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    When did MS do it??

  10. #10

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Beacon
    When did MS do it??
    Umm, you didn't hear?

    www.wehavethewayout.com which is something sponsored by MS and Unisys it's like anti-UNIX or something, it was running on Linux for a while. It's now switched to IIS. well actually they did it in such a hurry that they didn't even transfer the site contents, just the host.

    Oh now we're going to see how you react to THIS one when the story is turned..."HAHAHHAHAHA Microsoft SUCKS that's so pitiful and lame of them"
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  11. #11
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    Ohhh nope didnt hear that one now it makes sense!!

  12. #12

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Beacon
    Ohhh nope didnt hear that one now it makes sense!!
    Yep, read about it on [H]ardOCP front page.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  13. #13
    Black Cat JoshT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    WNY, USA
    Posts
    4,032
    I believe MS used to run www.microsoft.com on BSD before they invented IIS.
    Josh
    Get these: Mozilla Opera OpenBSD
    I have books for sale: "MCSD in a Nutshell" and "VB Distributed Exam Cram" - PM me for details. Will also trade for a decent ATX Pentium 2 MB/CPU/RAM combo.

  14. #14
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272
    Yep..Most of the dos network programs like ftp come from the BSD Ports...

    Microsoft likes BSD (and BSD Licence but not GPL). But they do have a business to promote.

    Can you Imagine them advertising like,

    "UNIX Platform (except the BSD flavors) locks you ..."

    Last edited by thinktank2; Apr 3rd, 2002 at 04:01 PM.

  15. #15
    Jethro
    Guest
    How long before MS have a go at doing a Linux? They cocked it up trying to do Unix, (Xenix was just horrible)....

  16. #16
    Fanatic Member Gandalf_Grey_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    the 42nd dimension
    Posts
    665
    well alot more sites have been caught running linux when they SHOULD be running IIS than the other way around

  17. #17

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Gandalf_Grey_
    well alot more sites have been caught running linux when they SHOULD be running IIS than the other way around
    like which ones? There are no sites that SHOULD be running IIS other than ones owned by Microsoft.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  18. #18
    Fanatic Member Gandalf_Grey_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    the 42nd dimension
    Posts
    665
    well how bout all the ones that are downing linux? a large percentage of them run apache

  19. #19

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Gandalf_Grey_
    well how bout all the ones that are downing linux? a large percentage of them run apache
    Apache also runs on Windows
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  20. #20
    Fanatic Member Gimlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    734
    Apache is the best web server weather you run it on Windows or Linux.

  21. #21

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Gimlin
    Apache is the best web server weather you run it on Windows or Linux.
    It probably is but I couldn't set it up.

    I'm using Xitami.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  22. #22
    Fanatic Member Gimlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    734
    Yah its a ***** to set up.

  23. #23

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Gimlin
    Yah its a ***** to set up.
    IIS actually isn't bad if you patch it

    And it's pretty easy to set up too.

    But I don't use it for very high-demand stuff so I just use Xitami, it's simple, small, fast, free, I recommend it
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  24. #24
    Frenzied Member Skitchen8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Binghamotn, NY
    Posts
    1,943
    i agree... xitami is by far the best server software i have ever used...
    Government is another way to say better…than…you.
    It’s like ice but no pick, a murder charge that won’t stick,
    it’s like a whole other world where you can smell the food,
    but you can’t touch the silverware.
    Huh, what luck. Fascism you can vote for.
    Humph, isn’t that sweet?
    And we’re all gonna die some day, because that’s the American way
    -Stone Sour

  25. #25
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    Your not joking are you???

    Xitami is good for say testing your web pages on your pc but apache is so much more powerful and robust.

    The reason you find it so hard is because you need to use command line stuff justin!! And when there was no pretty button to press you got all confused!
    j/king!

  26. #26

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Beacon
    Your not joking are you???

    Xitami is good for say testing your web pages on your pc but apache is so much more powerful and robust.

    The reason you find it so hard is because you need to use command line stuff justin!! And when there was no pretty button to press you got all confused!
    j/king!
    Yeah who said I was running a heavy duty web server? It does what I need it to do.

    Why do they have to use technology from the 70s. I hate command lines. They should die.

    Beacon if you want to spread the word of Apache help me set it up sometime..does it run in the background as an NT/2K service
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  27. #27
    Jethro
    Guest
    Originally posted by jpbtennisman


    Yeah who said I was running a heavy duty web server? It does what I need it to do.

    Why do they have to use technology from the 70s. I hate command lines. They should die.
    Except for every now and again having to drop down to DOS of course

    Linux actually does have a couple of GUI's to choose from, remarkably they both seem modelled after windows

  28. #28

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Jethro


    Except for every now and again having to drop down to DOS of course

    Linux actually does have a couple of GUI's to choose from, remarkably they both seem modelled after windows
    Yeah it has that KDE stuff

    I think command lines are old and antiquated...it's like 5 1/4 floppies or 486es, nobody uses them anymore, they were good while they existed, but why can't they just die.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  29. #29
    Jethro
    Guest
    Apple worked this out back in the eighties......with windows later versions you get all the powerful system control stuff in an easy to use form, rather than spending friggin hours hunting through manuals for some obscure command modifier.....

  30. #30

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Jethro
    Apple worked this out back in the eighties......with windows later versions you get all the powerful system control stuff in an easy to use form, rather than spending friggin hours hunting through manuals for some obscure command modifier.....
    Ya that's what I'm saying if this was something that was obsolete in the EIGHTIES why is it still being used 20 years later??
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  31. #31
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    Coz it's easier for net admins instead of clicking 6 times and waiting for each little picture to be opened etc etc.
    I can type cd or cat blah or whatever and you can do many things at once!

    KDE and gnome are 2 popular desktops managers for linux!

    Justin:
    On a windows box hell i've only ever done that once!
    Yep you can run it as a service if you want but Apache advise this should be done once installed succesfully as a console!
    What windows version?

  32. #32

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Beacon
    Coz it's easier for net admins instead of clicking 6 times and waiting for each little picture to be opened etc etc.
    I can type cd or cat blah or whatever and you can do many things at once!

    KDE and gnome are 2 popular desktops managers for linux!

    Justin:
    On a windows box hell i've only ever done that once!
    Yep you can run it as a service if you want but Apache advise this should be done once installed succesfully as a console!
    What windows version?
    As a console?

    2K pro.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  33. #33
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    Console window you know like any other app.


    Ok if you want i'll help give instructions or whatever!
    Now you have 2 choices Apache 2.0 beta or 1.3.24.
    I'd say 2.0 coz it's supposedly easier to install!!
    Though it has some bugs your not eactly using it for any real crunching are you?

    What u think?

  34. #34

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Beacon
    Console window you know like any other app.


    Ok if you want i'll help give instructions or whatever!
    Now you have 2 choices Apache 2.0 beta or 1.3.24.
    I'd say 2.0 coz it's supposedly easier to install!!
    Though it has some bugs your not eactly using it for any real crunching are you?

    What u think?
    OK sure...I'm all up for new stuff

    Thanks man, and no i'm not using it for advanced stuff..I just mainly host images off of it. And I'd rather run it as a system service.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  35. #35
    Jethro
    Guest
    Originally posted by jpbtennisman


    OK sure...I'm all up for new stuff
    Too easy Mind if it had of been Chit Chat

  36. #36
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    Sorry my computer crashed stupid windows took forever to load.

    Anyways just read-up on 2.0 after i had downloaded it a while back anyways they removed the binaries for it so i think we'll be stuck with 1.3.24!

    But thats ok!

    Go download apache_1.3.24-win32-x86-no_src.msi from here

    Tell me when you've done that!

  37. #37

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    OK i downloaded it...

    Now it asks me for:

    - Network Domain
    - Server Name
    - Administrator's Email Address

    I can figure out the last one but network domain and server name...I'm just hosting this off my IP I don't have a domain name. What do I do
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  38. #38
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    No it should be asking you for Server name, Domain name and administrative email account???????

    1 and the same i spose!

    Server name = your computer name or ip.
    Domain Name = localhost or 127.0.0.1 or leave blank.
    email = your email.

  39. #39

    Thread Starter
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    OK appears to be successful...it wasn't nearly this easy last time I tell you it sucked!!

    http://66.56.105.80/

    Now where does it save the content? And how can I change that location?
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  40. #40
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    At the moment it is running from the directory where you installed it to and serving documents from the htdocs directory!

    Look in your .conf files for that directory and change it to whatever!

    Once you've changed all your options in the .conf we'll get it running as a service!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width