|
-
Mar 24th, 2002, 04:39 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Vectors
Hey there,
Could someone take a look at this question,
The angle better vectors i + j and 2i + j + tk is pi/4. Find the possible values of t.
Ive been at it for a while now and cant seem to get the right answer.
Simplicity over efficiency!!!
-
Mar 24th, 2002, 05:32 PM
#2
transcendental analytic
cos a =(V1 dot V2)/(|V1||V2|)
solve V1.z
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Mar 24th, 2002, 07:59 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Yad think, ive been trying that and no luck.
Simplicity over efficiency!!!
-
Mar 24th, 2002, 08:32 PM
#4
Frenzied Member
Your notation is unfamiliiar to me. I assume that the two vectors in mathematical instead of engineering noation are the following.
(1, 1, 0) & (2, 1, t)
The dot (or scalar product) of those vectors is 3, which is not a function of t.
The cosine of the angle is 3 / SquareRoot(10)
Hence the angle is about 18.4349 degrees, not matter what value you assign to t.
Live long & prosper.
The Dinosaur from prehistoric era prior to computers.
Eschew obfuscation!
If a billion people believe a foolish idea, it is still a foolish idea!
VB.net 2010 Express
64Bit & 32Bit Windows 7 & Windows XP. I run 4 operating systems on a single PC.
-
Mar 25th, 2002, 04:29 AM
#5
transcendental analytic
i j and k is called the unit vectors and defines a coordinate system.
(1, 1, 0) dot (2, 1, t) is a function of t, i'm just too lazy to do it.
well i guess i have nothing else to do
((1*t-0*1) - (1*t-0*2) + (1*1-1*2))/(sqr(1^2+1^2)sqr(2^2+1^2+t^2))=cos(pi/4)
the rest is yours
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Mar 25th, 2002, 04:50 AM
#6
Don't you just mean:
((1*t-0*1) - (1*t-0*2) + (1*1-1*2))/(sqr(1^2+1^2)sqr(2^2+1^2+t^2))=cos(pi/4)
IS THE SAME AS:
(t-t-1)/(sqr(2)*sqr(5+t^2)) = cos(pi/4)
- I just simplified stuff like 1^2, 1*t etc.
IS THE SAME IS
-1/(sqr(2)*sqr(5+t^2)) = cos(pi/4)
=> -1/cos(pi/4)=sqr(2)*sqr(5+t^2)
=> -1/(cos(pi/4) * sqr(2)) = sqr(5+t^2)
=> sqr( 1/( (cos(pi/4) * sqr(2)) ^2) -5)=t
-
Mar 25th, 2002, 05:31 AM
#7
transcendental analytic
just call me lazy (sorry guv, yeah you were right but then again the t was in |V2|)
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Mar 25th, 2002, 07:56 AM
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Hey there,
I got the answers (+ and - 2), I left my calculator in degrees and not radians, thanks anyway.
Simplicity over efficiency!!!
-
Mar 25th, 2002, 03:37 PM
#9
-
Mar 25th, 2002, 08:40 PM
#10
Frenzied Member
how did i get involved in this?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|