|
-
Mar 23rd, 2002, 06:32 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Compile to P-Code and get Much Smaller files
I have been compiling all of my files to p-code for ages now and put my program windvd tweaker all over the net and no problems. Why do you all still use the other option.
-
Mar 23rd, 2002, 07:17 PM
#2
The picture isn't missing
you know VB3 decompliers? they decompile P-CODE, and Natvie code is not decomplible. so native code is much safer.
Remember, if someone's post was not helpful, you can always rate their post negatively  .
-
Mar 24th, 2002, 04:42 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
MMM
Thanks for the info. You mean decompile to the code that you started out with. That could be dangerous but if you are compiling your own stuff or free programs I don't think it is much of a risk. The file size is alot smaller and the speed of compiling is 10X on my pc so I will always use P-Code.
Do you know how to get a dvds region info from vb.
-
Mar 26th, 2002, 08:07 PM
#4
Lively Member
P-Code may be smaller but it is also slower then Native code. Alot slower in some cases.
-
Mar 26th, 2002, 08:26 PM
#5
The picture isn't missing
if it's just a fre KB smaller than why the hell would you choose the worse one?
MS made Native Code for a reason.
Remember, if someone's post was not helpful, you can always rate their post negatively  .
-
Mar 27th, 2002, 12:45 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
MMM
My prog needs to save about 30 settings to the registry and load them also. This takes about 0.1 of a second on the crappest pcs so smaller code is a nice bonus when speed isnt a factor.
I think I might use Native though because of the decompiling risk
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|