Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: differences between com and active x

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    20

    differences between com and active x

    Hi

    what is the differences between com and active x?

  2. #2
    Hyperactive Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Horst
    Posts
    262
    Please be more specific.

    The answer is a lot AND no differance at all.

    You can use an ActiveX EXE as COM object.

    Regards,

    VS

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    20

    COM

    Thanks VS

    Here are doubts to clear.
    As for as my knowledge is concern an activex control is nothing but like our textbox combo box etc. all controls where we can use in our applications. we can develop our own controls as we wish.

    Then what is COM, MTS eExactly where do we use.

    Thanks in advance

  4. #4
    Hyperactive Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Horst
    Posts
    262
    Hmm, sorry i'm not going to explain that. That's a bit too much for me. I have to do some work to.

    here are some linkies:
    http://www.microsoft.com/com/
    look under features and you'll find links to:
    MTS
    http://www.microsoft.com/com/tech/mts.asp
    COM
    http://www.microsoft.com/com/tech/com.asp
    DCOM
    http://www.microsoft.com/com/tech/dcom.asp
    COM+ (com for win 2000 and some more...)
    http://www.microsoft.com/com/tech/complus.asp

    Also look under resources at http://www.microsoft.com/com/

    If you're just starting with VB don't get overwhelmed. It's touch but hey you've gotto learn somewhere. Also try the MSDN cd's.


    http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/te...ns_Interop.asp

    Hope this helps.

    Regards,

    visualsander

  5. #5
    pvb
    Guest
    There is NO difference between ActiveX and COM. Only people who mix up marketing with the actual technology view ActiveX and COM as different. They are the same technology. An ActiveX EXE _IS_ a COM object and nothing else. An Active X DLL _IS_ a COM object and nothing else. MTS(now called COM+) is a COM object itself that acts a host wrapper for other COM objects(follow the links in the above post for more info on that). So if someone asks, which do you know better, COM or ActiveX? answer, "What a stupid question, they are the same technology".

  6. #6
    Your Ad Here! Edneeis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA (SoCal)
    Posts
    7,339
    Its good to see I'm not that only one that has read some of Dan Appleman's books. I agree with pvb, the name, that is the only difference.

  7. #7
    Black Cat JoshT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    WNY, USA
    Posts
    4,032
    And it used to be called OLE...
    Josh
    Get these: Mozilla Opera OpenBSD
    I have books for sale: "MCSD in a Nutshell" and "VB Distributed Exam Cram" - PM me for details. Will also trade for a decent ATX Pentium 2 MB/CPU/RAM combo.

  8. #8
    Serge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    2,744
    ActiveX is a third generation of OLE

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width