Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Damn differentiation

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    16

    Damn differentiation

    Hey there,

    Could someone try to differentiate

    (1 + x^3)^(1/2)
    ----------------
    x^2

    I get an answer but it needs simplifying and with god as my witness I cannot get it.

    Its mean to be the square root of (1 + x^3) so i just put to the power of 1/2.

    Thanks in advance
    Simplicity over efficiency!!!

  2. #2
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    UK.
    Posts
    728

    Smile Solution.



    Hope this helps.
    Digital-X-Treme
    Contact me on MSN Messenger: [email protected]

    [VBCODE]Debug.Print Round(((1097) - ((55 ^ 5 + 311 ^ 3 - 11 ^ 3) _
    / (68 ^ 5))) ^ (1 / 7), 13)[/VBCODE]

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    16
    Hey there,

    The answer in the book gives

    -(x^3 + 4)
    --------------
    2x^3(1+x^3)^1/2

    Dont know if you can convert it into that or not?
    Simplicity over efficiency!!!

  4. #4
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    UK.
    Posts
    728

    Smile Feedback...

    Hmm... I don't know. Possibly.

    Are you sure that is the correct answer? In its SIMPLEST form? I don't know how you could arrive at the answer given by the book... Anyone got any inputs? Am i missing something?
    Digital-X-Treme
    Contact me on MSN Messenger: [email protected]

    [VBCODE]Debug.Print Round(((1097) - ((55 ^ 5 + 311 ^ 3 - 11 ^ 3) _
    / (68 ^ 5))) ^ (1 / 7), 13)[/VBCODE]

  5. #5

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    16
    Helger thats how i have been doing it using the product and quotient rule but you dont get the answer. Thanks for the help both of you anyhow, still trying to find the answer though.
    Simplicity over efficiency!!!

  6. #6
    Helger
    Guest
    the one is the quotient rule alright. However the other is NOT the product rule. Repeat it is NOT. It is the [Kettenregel] (don't know the English term. Maybe 'chain rule'?)

    It is a function of a function. NOT a product of two functions. Maybe have another look.

    Helger

  7. #7

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    16
    I know, its the chain rule

    Just not thinking about what im writing, it still doesnt give whats in the book. Try it and see.
    Simplicity over efficiency!!!

  8. #8
    Helger
    Guest
    glad you didn't just mix those up. things like that suck most.

    My result is different from the book too

    I got (4x^3 - 2) / (x^3 * (1+x^3)^0.5)



    Helger

  9. #9

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    16
    Ill ask Bill (My maths teacher tomorrow) hell show me, he set it as an optional homework question and he does them all himself to check so hell know how to do it, it was listed as one of the harder questions though. Ill try again at it later.
    Simplicity over efficiency!!!

  10. #10
    Helger
    Guest
    Please post the result. I'm curious now myself.

    Helger

  11. #11
    Hyperactive Member thinktank2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Arctic
    Posts
    272

    Talking Easy...if you know what you are doing..

    let y = [(1 + x3)(1/2)] / x2

    then y*x2 = [(1 + x3)(1/2)]

    Squaring both sides,

    y2 * x4 = 1 + x3

    Diff.with respect to x

    [2y*(dy/dx)*x4] + [y2 * (4x3)] = 3x2

    2y*(dy/dx)*x4 = 3x2 - 4(x3)(y2)

    dy/dx = [3*x2 - 4(x3)(y2)] / [2*x4*y]

    // since y = [(1 + x3)(1/2)] / x2

    // and y2 = (1 + x3) / x4


    dy/dx = [3*x2 - ( 4(x3)*(1+x3)/x4 )] / [2*x4 * (1 + x3)(1/2) / x2]

    dy/dx = [3*x2 - ( 4(1 + x3)/x )] / [ 2*x2*(1+x3)(1/2)]

    dy/dx = [3*x3 - 4 - 4*x3]/[2*x3*(1+x3)(1/2)]

    dy/dx = -[x3 + 4]/[2x3 * (1+x3)(1/2)]

  12. #12

    Thread Starter
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    16
    Hey there,

    Although that does give the right answer, we hadnt learned implicity differentiation until this week and so I have kept at it and finally got it.

    Heres my working although its a bit sloppy.

    Its a bit big to include in the post.
    Simplicity over efficiency!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width