|
-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 01:48 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Lively Member
make .exe???
Simple question:
How do I build the .exe from a Windows Form using VB.NET beta 2? I don't see it anywhere.
Thanks,
Greg
-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 02:17 PM
#2
Hyperactive Member
(i dont have the IDE in front of me so i am trying to play this from memory) If you go to FILE | NEW you can create a setup package on one of the options, that is if you installed the whole ide setup of the 3 disks. There you can make your EXE. However, if you plan on using this program on another machine, you'll need the entire framework package. (130mb). Hopefully that changes with the real release.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 02:39 PM
#3
the framework is actually only about 20 megs...the sdk is 130 megs, but obviously end users dont need the sdk.
-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 03:00 PM
#4
Hyperactive Member
My mistake, but still, even 20 megs to run an exe... A little rediculous...
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 03:09 PM
#5
Well not really. Even 56k users can download it while they sleep.
And they only need to download/install it once
-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 03:25 PM
#6
Hyperactive Member
Looking at it from a home user or a customer standpoint, if i wasnt a developer, i wouldnt be downloading a 20 meg framework to get an application to run, its the same as java in that case.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 03:31 PM
#7
Thats true, but I still think it will work out ok as it will be included in future Service Packs and Windows versions. All we can do is wait and see how the consumer reacts.
-
Jan 22nd, 2002, 03:36 PM
#8
Hyperactive Member
If MS will include it, then that would be great instead of a seperate install. I guess alot of what i wrote is hear-say until the final relase is out.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 23rd, 2002, 05:32 PM
#9
Hyperactive Member
Mr Brown.. glad to see you are back on the boards.. I love how your thread asked about making an exe yet it turned into a dialog about the size of the sdk
-mcd
[vbcode]
'*****************************
MsgBox "MCD :: [email protected]", vbInformation + vbOKOnly, "User"
'*****************************
[/vbcode]
-
Jan 24th, 2002, 09:30 AM
#10
Ok I can finally give a definitive answer on this. I have never actually looked for how to make compile the assembly in .NET until last night. On the project explorer on the right hand side of the IDE(default) right click the project name and select Build. The compiled file will be in the bin directory of your projects directory.
-
Jan 24th, 2002, 09:32 AM
#11
Hyperactive Member
And Cander comes through with the answer!.. Excellent.. the question should be asked now, why would MS make it so you had to go to the bin directory to get the exe?? why not make it as easy as vb6 and just select the location you want it?
-mcd
[vbcode]
'*****************************
MsgBox "MCD :: [email protected]", vbInformation + vbOKOnly, "User"
'*****************************
[/vbcode]
-
Jan 24th, 2002, 09:51 AM
#12
Well I think it being that MS wanted to make every language go by a set standard way of doing things and I beleive in VC++ 6 that this was done just like this and they choose that way to use with all the languages in VS .NET. Thats the best answer I can think of. Everything in .NET pretty much revoloves around the bin directory from what I have seen. In ASP.NET, you put business objects in a bin directory and if you use Code Behind, the code compiles to a bin directory.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|