|
-
Jan 9th, 2002, 11:17 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Lively Member
Bill Gates vs Java
I heard that Microsoft has, or will be, dropping support for Java. Is this true?
-
Jan 9th, 2002, 12:48 PM
#2
Addicted Member
Yes, it's true.
They said they would dropping the automatic installation of the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) from their browser. But that just means that if you want to run java applets, you'll just have to get a plugin that sun has available for download already.
I think that Microsoft has also killed j++. They are promoting C# and have translators like JUMP to convert j++ into C#.
cudabean
-
Jan 9th, 2002, 05:24 PM
#3
Dazed Member
Funny thing is that you can get the plug in from Microsofts site. So does this make sense? They drop support but then they offer the plug in for download. In the future i hope that there is no clear cut winner in the Java C# war. I doubt there will be since there is too much existing Java code out there for someone to shift over to C#. Plus who wants to do everything in Microsoft?
-
Jan 10th, 2002, 09:53 AM
#4
Hyperactive Member
I am in no way siding with Microsoft, actually i have my differences i would love to iron out with them. C# is close enuff to Java that if a java programmer wanted to switch, it wouldnt take much. Change a few keywords, like 'Imports' amd stuff, and you'll have C#.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 10th, 2002, 11:32 AM
#5
Hyperactive Member
well Java is meant to be platform independent, which isn't necessarily agreeable w/ Mircrosofts ideaology
"There are only two things that are infinite. The universe and human stupidity... and the universe I'm not sure about." - Einstein
If you are programming in Java use www.NetBeans.org
-
Jan 10th, 2002, 11:40 AM
#6
Hyperactive Member
Thats true, i dont think i was ever able to get a J++ app to work in Linux, not that J++ is great, it was horrible, but it can take a windows activex contol and transform it to java usability, again, only on a MS platform.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 10th, 2002, 11:44 AM
#7
Dazed Member
Posted by CaptainPinko
well Java is meant to be platform independent, which isn't necessarily agreeable w/ Mircrosofts ideaology
What makes you say that? Because one would assume that Micro$oft wants all software to be run on Windows OS's? While i do agree with you somewhat i think microsoft would get left behind in the software industry if they stuck to this approach.
While i do like microsofts products i dont like the fact that they are trying to corner the market in every way shape and form. I have no problem using products from them but who wants to do everything according to the microsoft way? And of course people are going to say "well there are plenty of other companies the produce software products that you can use" but what happens if every company adopts that microsoft ideaology? Then when i go for a job i haved to be forced to work with software products or languages that are not my choosing.
-
Jan 10th, 2002, 12:38 PM
#8
Hyperactive Member
In defense to Other OS's and Development tools, you cant (currently) run C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, Etc on any platform other then a Windows Based OS. However Java can go Anywhere. If Microsoft wanted cross-platform (Which they wont because they want to be the only makes for OS) then C# or ASP.NET would be created for ANY OS, not just Windows.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 10th, 2002, 12:58 PM
#9
Dazed Member
I haven't looked into C# that much but i thought Microsoft created C# for for cross platform programming.
-
Jan 10th, 2002, 01:18 PM
#10
Thread Starter
Lively Member
Originally posted by Dilenger4
I haven't looked into C# that much but i thought Microsoft created C# for for cross platform programming.
Haha, that's a good one.
-
Jan 10th, 2002, 02:37 PM
#11
Dazed Member
Posted by Fool
Haha, that's a good one.
What do you find so funny
-
Jan 10th, 2002, 04:35 PM
#12
Addicted Member
-
Jan 13th, 2002, 11:27 AM
#13
Hyperactive Member
Its funny you mention J++, a few days ago Microsoft announced J#, J-Sharp, which is a remake of J++ for the .NET platform, which i am willing to bet wont be cross platform either. Unless they decide to release the .NET framework for other OS's, of course even if they do, linux users wont even glance at it. They wont want MS tampering with their Non-MS OS.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 13th, 2002, 07:49 PM
#14
Dazed Member
Thanks kleptos i didn't know MicroSoft was putting out J#. Ill have to look into it.
-
Jan 13th, 2002, 08:21 PM
#15
Hyperactive Member
Here is the link from Microsoft, i dont know if anyone wanted to check it out or not.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualj/jsharp/beta.asp
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

-
Jan 13th, 2002, 08:33 PM
#16
Dazed Member
Posted by kleptos
Here is the link from Microsoft, i dont know if anyone wanted to check it out or not.
Im gonna check it out right now. I want to see what Gates is up to now. World domination i guess.
-
Jan 13th, 2002, 11:20 PM
#17
Hyperactive Member
J++ wasnt so hot and famous when it was around so i doubt that J# will be all that great either, and to me it makes no sense, C# is like Java as it is, why create J#, it cant be all that different.
..::[ kleptos]::..
- Database Administrator (MSSQL 2000)
- Application Developer (C#)
- Web Developer (ASP.NET)

Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|