Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Visual FoxPro???

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    196

    Question Visual Foxpro vs Acces???

    Hello All,

    Well I'm not sure that this is the right forum but i've got a general question about Visual FoxPro.

    Visual Foxpro is distributed with Visual Studio right. What are the differences between developing in Visual Foxpro and Access. Is one alot better (more poweful / easier / faster / etc.) than the other? I know a fair bit about Access but not Visual Foxpro.

    I've been asked to assess the feasability of porting a Visual Foxpro database system to Access. I don't know (and neither do the people who asked me) if this is worthwhile to do or not. Thats why i want to find out more about the differences between the 2.

    I've looked for info on the net but havn't found any good comparisons of the 2.

    Any info or opinions would be great.

    Thanks

    Mark

  2. #2
    Guest

    Thumbs up Hmmmm...Foxpro still being used

    Foxpro was developed by Rushmore Technology as a dBase clone. Microsoft brought it because of thespeed of the search engine then available.

    Foxpro is meant to generate compiled database apps whereas Access was initially designed as a desktop database applications.

    If you are using vb/access then convert the Foxpro database to access, l think you can import it. That way you cut down on the number of application types you have to maintain. The real cost of software is in the maintenance cost to the business user.

    Foxpro is superior to Access in generating Business Modules, wherease Access is meant for more personal desktop databases.

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    196

    Exclamation

    thanks for the info jethro,

    i was looking at the msdn stuff for visual foxpro and it *seems* to be more powerful - like you say it can make separate applications - distributable etc.

    I like your signature re johnny h.

  4. #4
    Lively Member
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    u.s.a
    Posts
    127
    I currently did a foxpro project for a company that formaly used access.
    Foxpro is more powerfull but is a headache to use once you have gotten used to access.
    VB apps work better with access.
    I recomend sticking to access.
    As far as I know access 2000 lets you run seperate apps.
    But I'm not sure.
    Dan.


    [Edited by danab on 06-27-2000 at 10:36 PM]

  5. #5
    Guest

    Thumbs up There's a compiler available for 97

    Not sure about 2000.

    We switched from dBase to Foxpro, which wasn't such a hassle, but then made the move to vb/access/sql which was way better.

    FYI

    Access 97 has a 1 gig limit to db size, 2000 has a 2 gig.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width