How to Make an Atomic Bomb in 10 Easy Steps

[mikeycorn]

When the Al Qaeda was forced to abandon their safe houses in Kabul, many documents were found showing how much time and effort had been devoted to the research of creating an atomic device. The Times of London was able to obtain a copy of one of these documents, and the BBC showed a glimpse of the document in a broadcast.

Enter Jason Scott, reporter for the Web newsletter, rotten.com, one of the most depraved sites in all of cyberspace. Scott searched the Web for phrases visible in the BBC broadcast and discovered the document's source, a spoof published in 1979 in a takeoff on scientific journals known as The Journal of Irreproducible Results.

This, my friends is the actual document that keep those fanatical morons of Al Qaeda deeply immersed in study:


How to Make an Atomic Bomb

A Construction Project

The following paper is taken from The Journal of Irreproducible Results,
Volume 25/Number 4/1979. P.O. Box 234 Chicago Heights, Illinois 60411

1. INTRODUCTION

Worldwide controversy has been generated recently from several court
decisions in the United States which have restricted popular magazines
from printing articles which describe how to make an atomic bomb. The
reason usually given by the courts is that national security would be
compromised if such information were generally available. But, since it
is commonly known that all of the information is publicly available in
most major metropolitan libraries, obviously the court's officially
stated position is covering up a more important factor; namely, that
such atomic devices would prove too difficult for the average citizen
to construct. The United States courts cannot afford to insult the vast
majorities by insinuating that they do not have the intelligence of a
cabbage, and thus the "official" press releases claim national security
as a blanket restriction.

The rumors that have unfortunately occurred as a result of widespread
misinformation can (and must) be cleared up now, for the construction
project this month is the construction of a thermonuclear device, which
will hopefully clear up any misconceptions you might have about such a
project. We will see how easy it is to make a device of your very own
in ten easy steps, to have and hold as you see fit, without annoying
interference from the government or the courts.

The project will cost between $5,000 and $30,000, depending on how
fancy you want the final product to be. Since last week's column,
"Let's Make a Time Machine", was received so well in the new
step-by-step format, this month's column will follow the same format.

2. CONSTRUCTION METHOD
1. First, obtain about 50 pounds (110 kg) of weapons grade Plutonium
at your local supplier (see NOTE 1). A nuclear power plant is not
recommended, as large quantities of missing Plutonium tends to
make plant engineers unhappy. We suggest that you contact your
local terrorist organization, or perhaps the Junior Achievement in
your neighborhood.
2. Please remember that Plutonium, especially pure, refined
Plutonium, is somewhat dangerous. Wash your hands with soap and
warm water after handling the material, and don't allow your
children or pets to play in it or eat it. Any left over Plutonium
dust is excellent as an insect repellant. You may wish to keep the
substance in a lead box if you can find one in your local junk
yard, but an old coffee can will do nicely.
3. Fashion together a metal enclosure to house the device. Most
common varieties of sheet metal can be bent to disguise this
enclosure as, for example, a briefcase, a lunch pail, or a Buick.
Do not use tinfoil.
4. Arrange the Plutonium into two hemispheral shapes, separated by
about 4 cm. Use rubber cement to hold the Plutonium dust together.
5. Now get about 100 pounds (220 kg) of trinitrotoluene (TNT).
Gelignite is much better, but messier to work with. Your helpful
hardware man will be happy to provide you with this item.
6. Pack the TNT around the hemisphere arrangement constructed in step
4. If you cannot find Gelignite, fell free to use TNT packed in
with Playdo or any modeling clay. Colored clay is acceptable, but
there is no need to get fancy at this point.
7. Enclose the structure from step 6 into the enclosure made in step
3. Use a strong glue such as "Crazy Glue" to bind the hemisphere
arrangement against the enclosure to prevent accidental detonation
which might result from vibration or mishandling.
8. To detonate the device, obtain a radio controlled (RC) servo
mechanism, as found in RC model airplanes and cars. With a modicum
of effort, a remote plunger can be made that will strike a
detonator cap to effect a small explosion. These detonatior caps
can be found in the electrical supply section of your local
supermarket. We recommend the "Blast-O-Mactic" brand because they
are no deposit-no return.
9. Now hide the completed device from the neighbors and children. The
garage is not recommended because of high humidity and the extreme
range of temperatures experienced there. Nuclear devices have been
known to spontaneously detonate in these unstable conditions. The
hall closet or under the kitchen sink will be perfectly suitable.
10. Now you are the proud owner of a working thermonuclear device! It
is a great ice-breaker at parties, and in a pinch, can be used for
national defense.
3. THEORY OF OPERATION

The device basically works when the detonated TNT compresses the
Plutonium into a critical mass. The critical mass then produces a
nuclear chain recation similar to the domino chain reaction (discussed
in this column, "Dominos on the March", March, 1968). The chain
reaction then promptly produces a big thermonuclear reaction. And there
you have it, a 10 megaton explosion!

4. NEXT MONTH'S COLUMN

In next month's column, we will learn how to clone your neighbor's wife
in six easy steps. This project promises to be an exciting weekend full
of fun and profit. Common kitchen utensils will be all you need. See
you next month!

5. NOTES

1. Plutonium (PU), atomic number 94, is a radioactive metallic element
formed by the decay of Neptunium and is similar in chemical structure
to Uranium, Saturium, Jupiternium, and Marisum.

6. PREVIOUS MONTH'S COLUMNS
1. Let's Make Test Tube Babies! May, 1979
2. Let's Make a Solar System! June, 1979
3. Let's Make an Economic Recession! July, 1979
4. Let's Make an Anti-Gravity Machine! August, 1979
5. Let's Make Contact with an Alien Race! September, 1979


It's just hilarious picturing all that tongue-in-cheek going right over their heads.


Thanks to beachbum who posted the link to darwinawards.com and to who ever put together "The Mother of All Humor Archives" at http://www.sonic.net/~paul/humour/maillist.html

[kedaman]

Let's get to work then

[plenderj]

Heh I'll mail a little more than dune to you next time so ked

[Ali G]

I is go' da real atomic bomb in me pants, aiiiiiiiii

[kedaman]

Originally posted by plenderj
Heh I'll mail a little more than dune to you next time so ked

Ah, my local plutonium provider

[plenderj]

But thats pretty much so how you'd build an atom bomb... all you have to do is make the fissible material reach critical mass real quick...

[NotLKH]

The difficult part is arranging the triggering explosives so they don't blow apart the plutonium, but directs the plutonium evenly inword, without letting it squeeze thru the triggering wave, and somehow igniting the triggering explosive so that it all is set off within milliseconds.

Of course, How much trigggering explosive do you need to compact plutonium to critical mass?

Other than that, Its pretty simple.

[kedaman]

Ah, we have several experts in this area Well, I guess I'm the one that's going to choose our target(s)

[kedaman]

Jamie, get to work, I have the map for the potential routes, have your pirate ships in position

[mikeycorn]

Kedaman, Please PM me of your intended targets so I may update my Dead Pool list accordingly.

thanks.

[mikeycorn]

THANK GOD AL QAEDA DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THIS ARTCLE!


http://drew.corrupt.net/squirrel/

[Gandalf_Grey_]

The notion of two separate halves in a nuclear bomb is probably also obtained through the most recent bond movie the world is not enough. in which bond races up a tunnel to lock on to what he thinks is a nuclear weapons. However when he opens it up he finds that half (because it is devided into halves) is missing just producing a large explosion when it detonates. I agree with you the hardest part would be to make sure that all the explosive goes off at the same time. A millisecond may make the difference. The triggering explosives would have to be placed in a circle (this was done on the first nuclear weapons. Although i must insist that the titanium sphere be at least 2 or 3 feet thick in order to contain the explostion long enough to allow the plutonium to reach critical mass. This must also be because the explosion would concentrate most at the crack running along the equator of the sphere where the two halves were asembled. However the whole notion of a plunger is crazy since that would mean there needed to be space between the explosive and the inside of the sphere which would direct the explosion partly outwards and prevent the plutonium from reaching critical mass. The source of the explosion must be one with no moving parst and preferably contained within the detonating cap. so that there is no free space whre explosive could not reach.

[NotLKH]

Gandalf_Grey_,
Another possible source for the 2 semispheres is that when they were developing the Bomb in WWII, they were analyzing the fission energy produced with 2 semispheres as they approached each other. Even if they did use the semisphere method originally, I don't think its needed anymore. I still think its more problemic then helpful.

BTW, 2 foot thick titanium might be excessive, but I don't really know. Titanium is pretty strong, so I kinda thought a half inch to 2 inches would be enough. But, it all depends on how much energy the triggering explosives have to put out to get the seed to reach critical mass.

Ultimately, a simulation needs to be created and used to evaluate all the specs. Too bad we don't have any computers or programmers.... OH WAIT A SEC! Its 2002, not the '40s. I think it could be a whole lot easier to develop these days. Just so long as FBI Agent or Number 2 doesn't catch on { }

Disclaimer: Any discussions of Atomic Bombs presented in this thread are purely theoretical in nature, and in NO WAY do any of us promote the use of such weapons of mass destruction, especially when made or used by unauthorized civilians of any population.


-Lou