Minimum amount of RAM??

[compuGEEK]

Hopefully someone will agree with me on this....

My boss wrote a lengthy, bulky program that uses
the Data Environment designer and a stored procedure
that queries several tables. Most users of this program
reside here on our local NT network.

This program writes data to a SQL 7.0 database. It also
performs full-text searches. Our users have NT Workstations, ver 4.0 and systems with 64 Megs of RAM or less.

There is roughly around 15 - 30 simultaneous users of this program, some access it remotely, through an internet connection.

At this point, re-writing the program is not an option.

The users here on our local network are experiencing
EXTREMELY slow results from the program. I suggested that
the users of the program should have more RAM installed and need AT A MINUMUM, 64 Megs of RAM just to run the operation system, let alone a bulky program!

My boss disagree's with me and insists that 48 to 64
Megs is plenty of RAM and that there should be no performance issues at all!

Surely someone must agree with me!! Does anyone know of
some documentation or something that I can show him to
prove my point?

[Negative0]

How are you connecting to the SQL database.

I have found that ADO can be slow connecting to the SQL database. If you are using ADO try opening any recordsets with

rs.Open SQL, DB, adOpenForwardOnly, adLockReadOnly

I do agree with your boss that the RAM they have is sufficient to run the program.

Just a thought

Check the SQL in the stored procedures, make sure he is using the most efficent SQL Possible, Verify the indexes used , make sure he's not querying unnecessary fields, stuff like that. If the SQL is poorly written no ammount of memory can polish it.