Definition Intelligence

[NotLKH]

Originally posted by kedaman

You don't have to disagree, we're completely considering your argument, and also your definition of knowledge.

The "Group" Perspective, and My disagreement with Myself, derives from the post I placed before this post you commented on. I think you missed some of its points.

Anyways, In and Of itself, a Blind Conciousness, without any other Conciosness around to inform him of anything, can only judge itself as "Intelligent". It cannot rate itself as "How Intelligent", because that would require an External Comparison, ie.. He would have to be One of a Group of Conciousnesses that can Intercommunicate, in order to determine "How intelligent" he is.

An Individual Conciousness can only rate its "Intelligence" by a "Satisfied/Dissatisfied" rating, since there is no "Other" conciousnesses around for comparison. In this Non-Group Example.

After all, wouldn't you agree that a conciousness, that belongs to no group {By which I mean there is no other Conciousness that it can detect either directly or indirectly that it associates itself with, {which, communication is the best and most effective way of judging a beings "Conciousness"}}
MUST be considered The ultimate Intelligence of its Set?
Of course, We can't consider that, because if we're around to actually "consider" anything, means that no such lone individual conciousness exists that we know of.

{heh, Knowledge of a condition destroys said condition. Interesting...}
{'Course, Heisenburgs principle involved}

-Lou