1+1 can be equal to 11 if you do your math in binary
10 atually.
I was never trying to say that nothing exists. I was just trying to make the point that just because someone beleives something to be true doesn't mean it is. I chose to beleive that "I feel therefore I am." rather than "I think therefore I am." The statement made by Descartes was not meant to prove that things exist. He was using it as a defintion for Consciousness. He beleived that if a species can comprehend that it exists that it is therefore conscious.
According to my Reality (not theory), you're just have a spectra from 3 to 5, and that spectra does not explain why we're having a common reality around us the 1 to 7. This can be prooved by the spec of 2 to 6. Let's look at the difference between being awake and deaming.

1. What makes a dream so real you can touch it? - Your mind

2. What makes your observations real when you're awake - Your eyes and mind.
___
Then we have other people around us:

3. What makes the world real? - Our common world

4. What make prooved reality - Common sense

....

5. What makes FACT - Nobody knows, -But we still can refer to this one, and that's the big idea of kedamanology.


Ok when you pass the first line ___, you have two alternatives: 1. to take other people as real (you may continue) or 2. not. For the second alternative you must consider either they to be an illusion or that this illusion was created by something, so you're actually not in this case alone either.
The .... barrier is what you can't pass without knowing any FACTS, so if humanity where to explore universe, we have to pass this barrier one day. But if you exclude this one, you have to make all subcategories as illusions, including you. And that's nonsense, because reality includes you + something else.

And for all those infinite subcategories, we do not need them to be present in my theory at this state, I can make a infinite tree of those whenever i want when it it reality.
(a <=> b) <=> (b <=> a)

(a <=> b) & (b <=> c) => (a <=> c)
This was something I was looking for Sam, a way to explain more logical by using symbols. In each =>() We have a subreality and by each <=> we can explore them, so if we somehow can reverse engineer back to reality we may pass ..... barrier. If you think There's more subrealities (categories) that are somehow relevant to us, just mention them