Quote Originally Posted by gwboolean View Post
Odd how you have a tendency to jump to conclusions, that are incorrect, that many of the rest of us do not.
I'm interested to know more about tis tendency of mine. Can you provide links to previous examples where I've done so, because a tendency would require a pattern, not a single instance. In this particular instance, as well as in any others, we only know what you tell us. If you tell us that changing form properties blew up a project then the conclusion I will draw is that you changed some form properties and your project "blew up". I'm not sure what "blew up" would actually mean but it sounds serious, i.e. things are generally unusable after they have blown up or, at least, require significant repair. If there is no causal link between the changing properties and the project "blowing up" then why would you make a statement that clearly implies that there is and then criticise us for making that inference?
Quote Originally Posted by gwboolean View Post
I ended up blowing up another project because I cannot keep from trying to reset the default property settings to what I want
You do know that the word "because" indicates that A occurred as a direct result of B, right? If you just provide a full and clear explanation of the problem in the first place, avoiding irrelevancies, then there's less chance of any confusion.