View Poll Results: Do you agree with the theories in the first post?
- Voters
- 20. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes, it is just more political BS
-
No, he really means it; terrorists better run like hell
-
It's too hard to tell
-
Bush is a retard
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:08 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Is Bush making empty promises?
Is Bush sincerely trying to rid the entire world of all terrorism, or is he doing it to just further his politcal standing? Will the issue die out after we get those reponsible for the WTC incident?
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:15 PM
#2
Banned
Bush doesn't really realize that this isn't an occassional thing. What you saw at the World Trade Center is exactly what is going on in Israel every day on a larger scale. We'll see what happens.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:24 PM
#3
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by aknisely
Bush doesn't really realize that this isn't an occassional thing. What you saw at the World Trade Center is exactly what is going on in Israel every day on a larger scale. We'll see what happens.
Jewish boy, shadduap
no its totally different
Israel is abusing their rights
so they blow themselves up taking up some jews
its totally different,
now shadduap
too bad this attack was on americans....
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:26 PM
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Kovan's entered the fray, this thread will soon have 80 posts.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:28 PM
#5
Banned
Kovan's been on my ignore list for two and a half weeks, I don't care for anything he says.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:38 PM
#6
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:39 PM
#7
Thread Starter
Member
Originally posted by ghost ryder
filburt, can i ask why ur avatar has a pic of osama bin laden??
im assuming that you want to kill him for what happened in the USA??
excuse me, but there is no concrete proof that he is to blame, im amazed when i look around at the whole world is talking as if he has admitted responsibilty, they are talking to pakistan as if he is the one who has done this
he was denied access to the outside world, well so the taliban claim
now he may or he may not be responsible, and if he is then i will give you the gun to blow his mother****ing head off, but until then, dont jump on the bandwagon please, it pisses me off
just had 2 say that
I already said that.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:43 PM
#8
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:43 PM
#9
Banned
excuse me, but there is no concrete proof that he is to blame
There is. The hijackers have been identified as working under Bin Laden's group.
Anyways, it doesn't matter. Bin Laden was working on a death sentence before he destroyed the towers.
he was denied access to the outside world, well so the taliban claim
Well, if the Taliban says that, then I guess he's off the hook. I mean, look at the credibility of the Taliban!!
now he may or he may not be responsible
He is.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:52 PM
#10
Junior Member
akinsley, please just SHUT THE HELL UP!!
there is NO concrete proof, yea bin laden was on a death sentance, the taliban say he didnt have access, so maybe he did, maybe he didnt, how do we know for sure??
there are many hijackers who r linked 2 bin laden, so just coz a couple of then were trained under him dont mean ****
now like i said, if the man is responsible, then blow the **** out of HIM (not afghanistan)
but the problem is that bush seems intent on startin a war with afghanistan without any solid proof
and this may just be me, but does anyone else think that the FBI has found the info a bit too quickly??
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 05:57 PM
#11
Banned
akinsley, please just SHUT THE HELL UP!!
I hope you aren't kovan...
there is NO concrete proof
I already told you that many (if not all) of the hijackers have been linked to Bin Laden's terrorist organizations and suborganizations.
so just coz a couple of then were trained under him dont mean ****
It does mean ***. It means a whole bloody lot.
but the problem is that bush seems intent on startin a war with afghanistan without any solid proof
He doesn't want, nor is he going, to start a war with Afghanistan.
and this may just be me, but does anyone else think that the FBI has found the info a bit too quickly??
Considering that there is an incredible wealth of information, and hundreds of intelligence staff working for the FBI, the CIA, and other similar organizations around the world, I'm surprised they're releasing information this slowly.
If you think that they're telling all that they know, you're a damned fool.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:37 PM
#12
Junior Member
akinsley, this is your mission, should you choose to accept it
SHUT THE HELL UP!!
this message will self destruct if not stored properly
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:40 PM
#13
Frenzied Member
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ghost ryder
[B BOOOOOOOOM! UOTE]
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:41 PM
#14
Frenzied Member
GR I couldn't resist it!
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:44 PM
#15
Junior Member
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:46 PM
#16
Banned
What the hell is your problem?? I don't think I've said anything to upset you...
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:48 PM
#17
Junior Member
Originally posted by aknisely
What the hell is your problem?? I don't think I've said anything to upset you...
not really, just havin some fun
although u did piss me off with ur whole "its bin laden for sure, get him get him!!" thing
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:51 PM
#18
Banned
although u did piss me off with ur whole "its bin laden for sure, get him get him!!" thing
I didn't say that, and your refusal to even consider him as a suspect both frightens and amazes me.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:53 PM
#19
Member
by Ghost Ryder
now he may or he may not be responsible, and if he is then i will give you the gun to blow his mother****ing head off
I think that answers your above statement
Using VB6.0 (sp5), SQL Server 2000, Visual Studio .Net
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:55 PM
#20
Junior Member
well yea, basically it does
he is a suspect, but the problem is, there is no other suspects, that is what is gettin 2 me, NO ONE else has even been mentioned, i mean, how wierd is that
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:56 PM
#21
Banned
That really doesn't solve my problem. You told me to shut up and completely ignored the rest of my posts because I said that it was Osama Bin Laden's operatives that conducted the terrorist attacks.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 06:57 PM
#22
Banned
he is a suspect, but the problem is, there is no other suspects, that is what is gettin 2 me, NO ONE else has even been mentioned, i mean, how wierd is that
I don't find that weird as much as I find that incriminating.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:05 PM
#23
Junior Member
Originally posted by aknisely
He is.
you didnt say he was INVOLVED, you said he was TO BLAME
big difference pally
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:07 PM
#24
Frenzied Member
So, Back to Bush, I heard he was going to ask Congress to declare war. 4/5 americans want military action.
retired member. Thanks for everything 
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:09 PM
#25
Banned
Originally posted by ghost ryder
you didnt say he was INVOLVED, you said he was TO BLAME
Mind explaining how the leader of Al-Qaeda would not know the one of the most devastating terrorist acts was being prepared and funded by him? I find that to be an incredibly ludicrous claim.
Last edited by aknisely; Sep 16th, 2001 at 07:14 PM.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:16 PM
#26
Junior Member
Originally posted by markman
So, Back to Bush, I heard he was going to ask Congress to declare war. 4/5 americans want military action.
i know, thats a shame coz they r probably gonna get their wish, and that will start WW3
bush needs 2 do this rationally, coz lets say he bombs the aghani's
USA is happy. everyone is glad that "offenders" have been punished
out of the ashes rises thousands of afghani's, now with even more hatred for the USA, and even more commitment to their cause
the terrorists get their hands on some nuclear weapons (there r some in pakistan which could be taken)
they bomb washington, new york, chicago & LA. thus rendering the USA dead in the water, the USA launches its missiles as well as the UK stepping in as well
the aghani's have iraq on their side
sadam bombs london, paris, amsterdam (noooooooooo), madrid, barcelona, munich, berlin, aberdeen, birmigham, thus rendering europe dead in the water
every fire nuclear missiles at everyone else, nuclear winter, humanity dies, the cockroach rules the earth
ARE YOU HAPPY MR BUSH!?!?!?! YOU'VE DESTROYED THE EARTH, BUT HEY, AT LEAST YOU WON THE WAR ON TERRORISM, OH WAIT, NO YOU DIDNT YOU ****, YOU BECAME AND EVEN MORE VICIOUS TERRORIST AND WIPED HUMANITY OFF THIS PLANET, WELL DONE U HILLBILLY
p.s. i know you all think that the above may be extreme, but the scary thing is that it could happen, in a matter of months, we all make jokes about how stupid bush is, but the fact is that bush could very well start WW3, and that is something NO ONE wants to see, be they muslim, jew, christian, or just plain redneck
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:19 PM
#27
Banned
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:21 PM
#28
Junior Member
yeah ok, whatever, im too tired 2 be arguing with u
lyrical terrorism propaganda assassin
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:22 PM
#29
Banned
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:24 PM
#30
Thread Starter
Member
Originally posted by aknisely
You are kovan.
Kovan uses more newlines.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 07:25 PM
#31
Banned
He's trying to cover his tracks.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:42 PM
#32
Frenzied Member
It couldnt happen like that Ghost Ryder...Cause the US has satellites that can track radio-activity, thus detecting the Uranium needed in A-bombs. Its very hard to move them without the US knowing al about it.
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:50 PM
#33
PowerPoster
I agree with all the above that ryder said except ,I think, that WW3 is not going to start yet. Non of the muslim countries are united and they also also against Afghanistan(TRUE ISLAM).If Afghanis don't get any neuclear weapon then they can't get rid of America. You can also see that Pakistan is now going on the side of America to fight "true Islam"(***** Musharaf)
I don't know why all of muslims (on higher levels) want their chair and money foreever. I also believe that Osama should be punished if he did plot that attack...but there is not even one proof yet!
You can't have peace if your opposition(America) does not like to have peace!
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:53 PM
#34
Banned
I also believe that Osama should be punished if he did plot that attack...but there is not even one proof yet!
If I told you that the sky was blue, would you believe me? If I told you that the grass is green, would you demand proof?
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:54 PM
#35
Thread Starter
Member
Name three definitive pieces of evidence against him.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:56 PM
#36
PowerPoster
Originally posted by nishantp
It couldnt happen like that Ghost Ryder...Cause the US has satellites that can track radio-activity, thus detecting the Uranium needed in A-bombs. Its very hard to move them without the US knowing al about it.
You should also use the word "I think" bofore the sentence.
Nothing can be impossible. Simply, US said that nobody can attack on it in what so ever way. But you saw those attacks WTC that killed 1000's of people. US could not protect them even it had the best security in the world!
Don't be so pride that you (US) think you are God. Look at what happened to you now(the attacks), what happened to Soveit (the super power), and what will happen to you after attacking those brave talibans!
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:57 PM
#37
Thread Starter
Member
Apparently there was a "four-digit access code" in the planes' transponders, but the hijackers turned off the transponders. I wonder why Boeing designed the planes that way.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 08:58 PM
#38
PowerPoster
Originally posted by aknisely
If I told you that the sky was blue, would you believe me? If I told you that the grass is green, would you demand proof?
I believe that the sky is blue, and the grass is green because I have seen them. But I have not yet gotten any proof about Osama's involvment in those attacks.
AGAIN, A TRUE PROOF IS NEEDED!
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 09:05 PM
#39
Banned
Simply, US said that nobody can attack on it in what so ever way. But you saw those attacks WTC that killed 1000's of people. US could not protect them even it had the best security in the world!
If I were to meet you in a coffee shop, and, while pleasantly chatting, I were to jump up and drive a dagger in your eye, does that make you any less powerful? Does that make me stronger than you?
Name three definitive pieces of evidence against him.
- The hijackers, and their associates, have been linked directly to Osama Bin Laden's group.
- The incident follows the patten of Islamic generally, and specifically Bin Laden's, previous terror attacks.
- Bin Laden was reported to have informed Arabic newspapers of the impending attack four weeks ago.
- Bin Laden has publically denied his involvement in, but also condoned, the attack.
-
Sep 16th, 2001, 09:17 PM
#40
PowerPoster
Originally posted by aknisely
If I were to meet you in a coffee shop, and, while pleasantly chatting, I were to jump up and drive a dagger in your eye, does that make you any less powerful? Does that make me stronger than you?
You is exactly what I said. US thought that nobody will ever be able to attack on it *IN WHAT SO EVER WAY*
Nobody is ever safe. And nobody should be too much proud of himself.
- The hijackers, and their associates, have been linked directly to Osama Bin Laden's group.
- The incident follows the patten of Islamic generally, and specifically Bin Laden's, previous terror attacks.
- Bin Laden was reported to have informed Arabic newspapers of the impending attack four weeks ago.
- Bin Laden has publically denied his involvement in, but also condoned, the attack.
Again, the nations(we) are not shown any proof. These are all just words of the US government. All of the above points should be made clear with some kind of concrete proof.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|