|
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 07:19 AM
#1
Thread Starter
New Member
A.I. Movie (good or bad?)
I watched AI the other day and it was pretty good movie not the best though. But I always hear people downing AI movie and cannot find anyone that likes it. Iam I the only one that like AI ?
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 08:46 AM
#2
Addicted Member
The problem with A.I. is that the story was writen by Stanley Kubrick, who directs cold emotionless movies, where the viewers feel like passive spectators; whereas Steven Speilburg makes movies that makes the viewers feel like part of what is hapening.
BTW, Thanks for all your help
Member of the anti-gay cross-dressing trans-species wolves alliance.
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 08:48 AM
#3
Frenzied Member
so in other words
it SUCKED
at lest thats my opinion
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 08:59 AM
#4
Thread Starter
New Member
Whaaaa ha ha ha...
Dn't think it really sucked that bad, but it is kinda weird. Specially when AI meets that hoe. Robots for pleasure is nasty!
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 09:03 AM
#5
Frenzied Member
ha ha
i honestly thought it was a shame that a movie like that could make it to theatres
so it did suck that bad
good i didnt pay to see it
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 01:31 PM
#6
Fanatic Member
Its a thinking movie. Don't judge it like entertainment.
-C
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 01:32 PM
#7
Banned
Spielberg should've helped out on jurassic park 3; now we have 2 bad movies.
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 01:39 PM
#8
Frenzied Member
I only didn't like the ending....otherwise I liked it....kubricks oddest movie was definatley a space oddessey......*** happening in that thiing....he was like on a half hour lsd trip
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 01:40 PM
#9
Banned
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 01:45 PM
#10
New Member
kubrick was always on a halfhour lsd trip
Byte Me
Visit the TurtleTips forums!
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 01:47 PM
#11
Banned
half-hour film time = several days IRL
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 08:23 PM
#12
Addicted Member
2001 was just kubrick's attempt to stick as many references into a movie as he could. In every seen there were like 10 references to something. It's just alot of deep shiat. Think of it as a M.C. Escher painting (pretty, but doesen't make any since).
BTW, Thanks for all your help
Member of the anti-gay cross-dressing trans-species wolves alliance.
-
Sep 8th, 2001, 10:44 PM
#13
Addicted Member
That movie started off pretty good, then got weird, then started to make a little sense, then the ending was stupid.
I really thought I misunderstood it, and I wanted to think it was a great movie that I didn't understand.
Nope, it was stupid. I don't buy the critics who say "you didn't get it, it's a masterpiece." Um, no.
Better movies:- Memento
- Unbreakable
- Traffic
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 10:55 AM
#14
Frenzied Member
I hated unbreakable. it was kind of obvious that samuel jackson was bad.
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 11:09 AM
#15
Fanatic Member
Unbreakable was good...the ending itself was worth it.
-C
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 11:41 AM
#16
Frenzied Member
I like most of his movies though...the negotiator was great...and he was in sphere wasn't he?
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 11:43 AM
#17
New Member
He was also quite cool as Zeus in Die Hard With A Vengeance.
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 11:46 AM
#18
Frenzied Member
never seen any die hard's
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 11:47 AM
#19
New Member
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 11:50 AM
#20
Frenzied Member
i guess I'll have to rent one next time I stop into blockbuster
-
Sep 9th, 2001, 05:36 PM
#21
Monday Morning Lunatic
Class films ITV showed all three in quick succession
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|