|
-
Sep 5th, 2001, 10:32 AM
#12
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by FATBOYPEE
true, in essence, but they're a kind of new language ?
No.
Bit like the old txt msgng these days, few words to say alot.... these little cheery Bsdtds say alot by conveying a message, perhaps not strictly an acronym but just as irritating if you don't know what fk : ()!!!<><>>< is supposed to graphically mean !
nuthin makes me madder than when some1 types with a complete dissrespect for grammar and puncuation. if ne1 finds this kewl than he obviously needs a severe thrashing about the head + shoulders with a broke bottle. do u find this kewl.
The sad thing here is, I can't quite reduce the language to the level of idiocy achieved today. I think it is safe to say that IRC and the ilk have helped to set back education in America by 100 years.
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|