|
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:10 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
Which Athlon chipset?
Some Athlon boards use the Via KT266 chipset, some use the AMD 761 chipset... any thoughts on which is preferable? Both seem to support PC2100 DDRRAM. What's the difference?
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:14 AM
#2
Frenzied Member
761 for now. Although i hear Via's new revision of the KT266 is supposed to be a lot better.
Ask these kinds of questons at www.pctsonline.com
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:18 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
Can you give any reasons?
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:28 AM
#4
Frenzied Member
It's faster and more compatible than the KT266. I can't find links right now but I've seen a ton of benchmarks with similar configs, and the 761 always performed faster. And there are no Creative/VIA nightmares to deal with either.
Good 761 boards are the Epox 8k7a(+), Abit KG7, or the gigabyte 7dxr.
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:29 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
What about the Asus A7V/A7M ?
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:37 AM
#6
Frenzied Member
I never liked the A7M because you can only overclock via FSB increases
A7V is based on the VIA chipset and it's $199, and only one person seems to sell it on pricewatch. For the price i can get an Abit kg7, with AMD 761, 6 PCIs, and 4 DDR slots. (Some people think Abit boards are iffy though, so you may want to go with one of the other two i mentioned.)
Also, remember, nForce is just around the corner...
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:39 AM
#7
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
Is nForce going to be better than, say, GeForce 3 though? I've seen some news coverage of it and I got the impression it wasn't intended for the the high-end market, except in laptops.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:42 AM
#8
Frenzied Member
the nForce is a *good* integrated board, but you can still add on stuff. Say you want a GF3. no there is no nForce board planned at the moment with a GF3 onboard but it has an AGP slot, so you can pop one in. (it'd be cool ifyou could use the other onboard video as a 2nd monitor) And since you won't have to install sound (onboard sound is better than most), LAN, etc, you'll have more PCI slots.
Also it has this new bus technology, i forgot what it's called, its supposed to go 30% faster, and that's the main thing attracting a lot of people.
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 06:55 AM
#9
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
I don't really care whether it's on a card or onboard, I'm just wondering about price/performance. Is nForce intended to be a way of getting cheap, good 3D performance or is it intended to be better performance-wise than previous products?
Or is the bus tech transferable to forthcoming high-end products?
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 07:02 AM
#10
Frenzied Member
It sort of combines both..all the hardcore guys seem to be excited about it so you may want to look at it...
I have to head out to school now, you might want to post this on pctsonline.com
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 07:43 AM
#11
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
Would I get a thump if I *acchemed* the P4 processor ?
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 08:30 AM
#12
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
If you want to pimp for Intel feel free, but you'll notice that the question isn't "Which P4 chipset?" 
What I'm most interested in is what the differences between the two chipsets are. Or if there are other alternatives.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 08:43 AM
#13
(onboard sound is better than most)
Give examples of what it's better than... I bet my SB Live! MP3+ 5.1 will beat the **** out of it
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 02:37 PM
#14
Frenzied Member
back on topic..i don't want to even hear P4
Last edited by JungleMan; Sep 4th, 2001 at 03:20 PM.
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 02:42 PM
#15
Hyperactive Member
Sorry I'm late into the discussion.
I just built a system with an ASUS A7A AliMagic board (It takes both SDR and DDR ram). I'm very impressed with it. It's incredibly stable and runs quite happily at 1.4ghz with a 1.2ghz Athalon. It won't go to 1.5ghz, but I haven't tried anywhere in between yet.
SD
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 09:10 PM
#16
Originally posted by jpbtennisman
It's faster and more compatible than the KT266. I can't find links right now but I've seen a ton of benchmarks with similar configs, and the 761 always performed faster. And there are no Creative/VIA nightmares to deal with either.
Good 761 boards are the Epox 8k7a(+), Abit KG7, or the gigabyte 7dxr.
that is right. the 761 is capable of overcloacking the FSB higher than the VIA chipset.
for the 761 chipset
http://www.amd.com/news/prodpr/asus.html
for the kt266a chipset (new one)
http://www.via.com.tw/jsp/en/products/apollo/kt266a.jsp
for the kt266 chipset
http://www.via.com.tw/jsp/en/products/apollo/kt266.jsp
-
Sep 4th, 2001, 09:10 PM
#17
Frenzied Member
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Sep 5th, 2001, 12:04 AM
#18
Hyperactive Member
Nah! - Nothing can compete with my ZX-80. I only use the Athalon for playing MP3 and surfing porn (it doesn't look that good in the zx-80 hi-res mode of 256x200x2)
SD
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|