|
-
May 1st, 2000, 08:56 AM
#1
Has anyone ever tried the original basic? Download it here http://www.geocities.com/jake_e_bush/vbasic.htm
-
May 2nd, 2000, 08:35 AM
#2
Hyperactive Member
Probably not
I would think not, if it is older than AppleSoft Basic then it wouldn't include any of the more advanced functions, like separate subroutines and stuff.
-
May 2nd, 2000, 12:21 PM
#3
Nope
Nope, it doesnt include anything. Its all one long row of code starting with
10 Cls
And ending with
9999 End
-
May 3rd, 2000, 11:08 PM
#4
People...
People, you should definitly check this out, its a great history leason!
-
May 3rd, 2000, 11:18 PM
#5
Fanatic Member
What about BBC Basic and Basic for ZX Spectrum. Surely it was not before that lot - I thought BASICA first appeared with the IBM clones in the early-mid 80s. The Spectrum was around in the very early 80s.
John
-
May 4th, 2000, 02:29 AM
#6
The first Programming language was Algorthoriam or something like that..it was around the 60s
-
May 4th, 2000, 02:38 AM
#7
Frenzied Member
I rebember BBC BASIC, That was Great. That was my 2nd language, my first was on this wierd calculator thing I had when I was 8, You could only see one line at a time and that line was only 12 characters long, it was brilliant, it had 16K of memory and by the time I put it to rest It was falling apart because I handled it so much.
-
May 4th, 2000, 12:58 PM
#8
transcendental analytic
Have anone used GWBASIC out there? It was my first language
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 5th, 2000, 02:26 AM
#9
My first languge was Qbasic. But befoire that I used Batch files (I don't know if they count or not)
-
May 5th, 2000, 03:40 AM
#10
transcendental analytic
batch files! LOL! HEhe, well it's somekind of programming language, or should i say more like a script
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 5th, 2000, 03:49 AM
#11
Back then i was stupid enough to think that you could make a game using batch files!
-
May 5th, 2000, 05:23 AM
#12
transcendental analytic
I had my batch files to "execute" the bas .bas files with gwbasic, i thought they was like real exe-files.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 5th, 2000, 05:26 AM
#13
you could run those files without compiling them into EXE's??
-
May 5th, 2000, 10:28 AM
#14
Hyperactive Member
Well isnt BASIC an interpretted language?
"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
-
May 5th, 2000, 05:58 PM
#15
transcendental analytic
Gwbasic rocks! There's a system command which exits to dos and running gwbasic filename, runs a basfile, it's almost like exe's when u put a batfile to do this
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 5th, 2000, 07:01 PM
#16
Frenzied Member
I made a great game with batch files, It was text based obviously, but it had some great ASCII art
-
May 5th, 2000, 07:15 PM
#17
How'd you make a game using Batch files? what was it like?
-
May 6th, 2000, 01:54 PM
#18
Conquistador
does anyone ever write batch fiels?
-
May 6th, 2000, 05:37 PM
#19
transcendental analytic
I write to my autoexec.bat sometimes
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 6th, 2000, 05:48 PM
#20
Frenzied Member
M'Game was just a sort of "You arrive at a swamp, there is a boatsman who offers to take you accross."
and you'd have to write "Take Boat", or "go to Castle"
basicly I had loads of directories, one for each "place" and a little batch file in the directory for each command and one to put the picture up. as you moved through the game all the little batch files got moved and deleted and added because you were changing what you could do, You had to unzip the whole thing every time you started.
-
May 6th, 2000, 09:24 PM
#21
I don't think there is a need for batch files today.(with the exception of autoexec) In Windows, we have shortcuts instead of bach files.
-
May 6th, 2000, 11:58 PM
#22
?????
-
May 7th, 2000, 12:38 AM
#23
Hyperactive Member
Everynow and then I do have to change my autoexec.bat and I find bat files a convinient way of distrubing Java programs for Windows. When everyone who has Windows has WSH installed I guess we won't need .bat files anymore.
"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
-
May 7th, 2000, 02:55 AM
#24
Chimp-> Batch files work like shortcuts in windows. For example: If you type C:\Mygame.exe, the computer will load that file up. They also work as initializing drivers for Windows (like your autoexec.bat file)
-
May 7th, 2000, 04:08 AM
#25
transcendental analytic
Well the LNK's in windows doesn't really replace the batman file, you can make pretty advanced things with it.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 7th, 2000, 05:49 AM
#26
Hyperactive Member
Batman files (is that what were calling them now?) are more like a simple form of shell programming. Not up to what you can do in Unix/Linux but they still came in pretty handy back in the days of DOS.
"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
-
May 7th, 2000, 05:52 AM
#27
A little off subject but I heard the Win2K will not be supporting DOS anymore.
-
Jul 8th, 2004, 08:53 AM
#28
Hyperactive Member
I agree.
Also, I would like to draw to everyone's attention the following quote by ked...
-
Jul 8th, 2004, 09:06 AM
#29
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|