Results 1 to 39 of 39

Thread: IE6 is out of preview

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member nabeels786's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    919

    IE6 is out of preview

    yay! go get it:
    www.microsoft.com/ie
    Visit www.fragblast.com
    Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system




    (__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?

  2. #2
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    There is no big difference between ie5.5 and ie6
    Baaaaaaaaah

  3. #3
    scoutt
    Guest
    Originally posted by abdul
    There is no big difference between ie5.5 and ie6
    what???????? you are joking right

    itis a big difference. it looks totally different. it looks like MSN, different skin.

    and by the way you are alittle late
    http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=99529

  4. #4
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    Sorry, I did not know that it had skins with it now. I just downloaded the preview version of it once and it did not hav skins in it so there was not much difference.

    I will download it for sure now
    Baaaaaaaaah

  5. #5
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    Oooh... Aaaah... it has skins.

    ***?

    I hope it has something more than skins. I hope it is smaller, faster, and 100% compliant with all W3C standards.

    I also hope it is configureable, letting me install only the options I want.

    It should also have multiple integrated windows so you can open as many pages as you want with one instance of the browser.
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  6. #6
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    ohhh sweet
    Baaaaaaaaah

  7. #7
    Originally posted by CiberTHuG
    Oooh... Aaaah... it has skins.
    It does? I just installed it and couldn't find any such option...

  8. #8
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    no, I just checked ms website now and it does say anything about skins

    It just says that it has a new design in Window Xp
    Baaaaaaaaah

  9. #9
    But I liked the XP look. Bummer.

  10. #10
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    Okay, everyone missed my sarcasm.

    I don't care about skins, I want to know about performance.

    You buy a Mustang for looks. I buy a Talon to kick your ass in the quarter mile.
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  11. #11
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    For me, I will get it based on its appearence
    Baaaaaaaaah

  12. #12
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    I want something that doesn't crash
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  13. #13
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    And MS product always does
    Baaaaaaaaah

  14. #14
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    Originally posted by abdul
    For me, I will get it based on its appearence
    Yes, well you are an idiot. Civilization will be better off when you and yours die off.

    If you are sick of an inferior product, but you get something based on looks only. What is that about?
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  15. #15
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    I should have made my post more sensible:

    Actually, If IE6 has the same old interface then the previous version is still better than downloading it again...and now this version won't support Netscape-like plugins, java technology, and that quicktime player
    Baaaaaaaaah

  16. #16
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    You are HERE •™
    Posts
    1,300
    I here IE 6 is loaded with Bugs. Cnet has suggested people to wait on this until they come out with a SP1 for this. It also does not support any Netscape pluggins. I guess it's Payback time. It will support ActiveX components as long as they match up to the buggy code. LOL...The way I understand it all these new apps based on XP, which IE 6 is, are going to be buggy. Microsoft just may end up taking themselves down......It wouldn't hurt my feelings. LOL...

  17. #17
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    Since it is just shy of your goal...

    Originally posted by abdul
    edited by Thug

    Actually, If IE 6 has the same old interface, then the previous version is still better then downloading 6. Now 6 won't support plugins, Java technology, and the Quicktime player.
    And if I understand you, you want a browser that is no more complaint then the one you have, and doesn't support Java, and doesn't support Quicktime, and doesn't support plugins, as long as it looks prettier?

    ***?
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  18. #18

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member nabeels786's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    919

    it works great

    it really does. my IE rarely ever crashes anyway..

    i think the media bar should allow you to play MP3s on your drive from a playlist. and if you open a new window, the song its playing will still be playing. and if you close that window, whatever its playing will transfer over to the new window.


    combined with iSpeed its pretty fast..
    Visit www.fragblast.com
    Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system




    (__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?

  19. #19
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140

    Re: it works great

    Originally posted by nabeels786
    i think the media bar should allow you to play MP3s on your drive from a playlist. and if you open a new window, the song its playing will still be playing. and if you close that window, whatever its playing will transfer over to the new window.
    This is something I dislike about the MS approach to UI.

    I don't want one application that does everything for me. Call me crazy, but... I want my web browser to only have web browsing code. I want my MP3 player, to only have MP3 player code.

    Now I can understand a media player that supports MPx, instead of just MP3. And I can understand my web browser having hooks to start my media player.

    But the two should be seperate applications, on the off chance that I like one and not the other. Or I upgrade one and not the other, or, heaven forbid, I just don't want one, just the other.
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  20. #20

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member nabeels786's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    919
    Originally posted by CiberTHuG
    Since it is just shy of your goal...



    And if I understand you, you want a browser that is no more complaint then the one you have, and doesn't support Java, and doesn't support Quicktime, and doesn't support plugins, as long as it looks prettier?

    ***?

    yeah, i dont really care about looks, as long as it works.


    i just reformatted...ahhh outlook need antialiased icons..i dunno IE6 just seems reallly different..
    Visit www.fragblast.com
    Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system




    (__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?

  21. #21

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member nabeels786's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    919

    Re: Re: it works great

    Originally posted by CiberTHuG


    This is something I dislike about the MS approach to UI.

    I don't want one application that does everything for me. Call me crazy, but... I want my web browser to only have web browsing code. I want my MP3 player, to only have MP3 player code.

    Now I can understand a media player that supports MPx, instead of just MP3. And I can understand my web browser having hooks to start my media player.

    But the two should be seperate applications, on the off chance that I like one and not the other. Or I upgrade one and not the other, or, heaven forbid, I just don't want one, just the other.

    yeah, but i also like less clutter in my taskbar. but winamp takes care of the audio stuff. i think IE is microsoft best program. so what if its uninstallable and integrated into windows, doesnt matter to me. my windows hasnt crashed once since i installed 2k on it (which is more than a month now). i like IE being integrated, it makes it easier..i was reading a mag that said XP stood for xtended proceedings, yeah its pretty wrong of them to include/integrate everything...damn those meglomaniacs
    Visit www.fragblast.com
    Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system




    (__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?

  22. #22
    scoutt
    Guest
    Originally posted by abdul
    no, I just checked ms website now and it does say anything about skins

    It just says that it has a new design in Window Xp
    I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say anything about different skins. I said it has a different skin and it is different. like Abdul said it is like the design of XP and I think that is ugly.

    But I agree with CiberThug, I don't want pretty, just want it to work. I hate the mp3 bar and all that crap. I used it once and uninstalled it. good ridence

  23. #23
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    Has anybody even gotten window xp beta or any other edition?

    Will the ISPs supoprt this version after it is released because I can't get my inernet working right now on windows xp.
    Baaaaaaaaah

  24. #24
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,140
    Originally posted by abdul
    Will the ISPs supoprt this version after it is released because I can't get my inernet working right now on windows xp.
    And how is this problem related to your ISP? The protocols have not changed. You have a problem in XP.

    but i also like less clutter in my taskbar.
    Then don't put anything in your taskbar. I personally don't use the mouse, so I keep clutter to a minimum by not needing it.
    Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
    As always, RTFM.

    WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
    Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
    YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.

  25. #25
    Originally posted by abdul
    Has anybody even gotten window xp beta or any other edition?

    Will the ISPs supoprt this version after it is released because I can't get my inernet working right now on windows xp.
    Yes and yes. IE just uses standard HTTP like any other browser, so any ISP worth a d*** should support it.

  26. #26

    Thread Starter
    Fanatic Member nabeels786's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    919
    IE6 is full of bugs? ermm i dont think so


    someone shud make a prog that will subclass IE into a mdi window..hey theres an idea!

    /me starts VB
    Visit www.fragblast.com
    Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system




    (__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?

  27. #27
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    Originally posted by filburt1


    Yes and yes. IE just uses standard HTTP like any other browser, so any ISP worth a d*** should support it.
    You misunderstood that. I was talking about windows xp that my ISP does not support this version of window
    Baaaaaaaaah

  28. #28
    Frenzied Member Skitchen8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Binghamotn, NY
    Posts
    1,943
    your isp doesn't have sh*t to do with your windows version
    Government is another way to say better…than…you.
    It’s like ice but no pick, a murder charge that won’t stick,
    it’s like a whole other world where you can smell the food,
    but you can’t touch the silverware.
    Huh, what luck. Fascism you can vote for.
    Humph, isn’t that sweet?
    And we’re all gonna die some day, because that’s the American way
    -Stone Sour

  29. #29
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    My ISP is *****ed up but I can't find any other DSL ISP in my town

    I realy like to have internet access on windows xp and also linux but my ISP does not work on any of them
    Baaaaaaaaah

  30. #30
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    BTW Skitchen:

    You signatures are great. I was always looking for those 3 sites
    Baaaaaaaaah

  31. #31
    Frenzied Member Skitchen8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Binghamotn, NY
    Posts
    1,943
    lol, no one tell john... ill get caps locked at if he finds out
    Government is another way to say better…than…you.
    It’s like ice but no pick, a murder charge that won’t stick,
    it’s like a whole other world where you can smell the food,
    but you can’t touch the silverware.
    Huh, what luck. Fascism you can vote for.
    Humph, isn’t that sweet?
    And we’re all gonna die some day, because that’s the American way
    -Stone Sour

  32. #32
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    It is a good resource anyway
    Baaaaaaaaah

  33. #33
    scoutt
    Guest
    if you are running DSL then you might have to get rid of it. if Winxp doesn't support some of the stuff that your ISP has to have in order for the DSL to connect to them, then ya you will have to go without or get dialup. I don't think you should have any problem though as XP is not that much different than any other windows, as far as the networking goes.. I wouldn't think.

    Linux on DSL might be a little harder. I don't know how to hook linux for DSL as I never had to do it.

  34. #34
    PowerPoster abdul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,827
    what kind of connection do you thing is better other then dial-up? dial-up is so slow now. What most of the people use anyway?
    Baaaaaaaaah

  35. #35
    scoutt
    Guest
    cable is much better than dialup and DSL

  36. #36
    Banned aknisely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    America-lite (Canada)
    Posts
    160
    Originally posted by scoutt
    cable is much better than dialup and DSL
    The cable service providers in Edmonton can't keep their damned thing up for more than ten minutes, and I'm not kidding. I've had my DSL for three years with Telus Communications, and downtime has totalled about an hour.

  37. #37
    scoutt
    Guest
    see it all depends on who provides it. I have had @home and I never had a problem.

  38. #38
    PowerPoster Beacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pub Floor
    Posts
    3,188
    Here's a goodie:

    Can anyone tell me how google and others do this:

    http://toolbar.google.com/

    And i.e toolbar or something and can you do it in vIsual BAsic?

    anyone??

    thanks

  39. #39
    scoutt
    Guest
    it is a plug-in that you download and I think you can do it in VB. if I remember right someone asked this question about 3-4 months ago in the general forum, it might have been longer though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width