|
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 01:47 PM
#1
 Only a Guru can answer this one!
What's 1 + 1? 
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 01:52 PM
#2
Frenzied Member
2 if your using mathematics
11 if your using string concatination
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 01:54 PM
#3
Frenzied Member
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:08 PM
#4
transcendental analytic
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:14 PM
#5
Frenzied Member
in math:
if you are using alpha numerical then 2
if you are using base2 then its 11
in expresions:
something easy
"put it together"
what kind of answer are you looking from matt?
~~~Dimava~~~
NXSupport - Your one-stop source for computer help
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:17 PM
#6
transcendental analytic
no, an expression doesn't implicate
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:20 PM
#7
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by kedaman
no, an expression doesn't implicate
What do you mean by implicate?
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:22 PM
#8
transcendental analytic
there's no interpretation accumulated in an expression
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:24 PM
#9
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by kedaman
there's no interpretation accumulated in an expression
Yeah, and that doesn't help. Perhaps if I knew what you were reffering to. This expression doesn't implicate what, and why was it being coherced?
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:28 PM
#10
transcendental analytic
well implicate anything in general, i mean an expression doesn't say anything to you unless it's applied in a context
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:29 PM
#11
Frenzied Member
Reminds me of . . .
Reminds me of a joke about a consultant and an executive who was interviewing secretaries. The executive said: “You have advised me about everything else, why don’t you interview the three applicants?”
To each applicant, the consultant asked one question: “How much is 2 + 2?” The executive was confused and asked what was the point of the question.
The consultant replied that others had surely checked references, abilities, et cetera. Else the three women would not have been granted personal interviews with the CEO himself. It was already known that all three were well qualified for the job. He explained as follows.
The first girl had immediately replied 4. That indicated that she was confident and quick. It also indicated that she had little imagination and therefore little initiative. She never considered anything but the obvious answer.
The second girl had started to answer 4, then muttered that the question was so easy that there had to be a catch, so she answered 22. That indicated that she had imagination and would think before answering questions or taking orders. She could be relied on to use some initiative, which would be good, but which might result in her doing things you did not want done.
The third girl waffled between the two possible answers, obviously looking for a clue to which was expected. This indicated that she would always be eager to please her boss, trying to determine what he really wanted rather than jumping to hasty conclusions on her own.
The executive said he was amazed at how much was learned from that simple question. “Which one would you hire?” he asked.
The reply was “The one with the big breasts.”
Live long & prosper.
The Dinosaur from prehistoric era prior to computers.
Eschew obfuscation!
If a billion people believe a foolish idea, it is still a foolish idea!
VB.net 2010 Express
64Bit & 32Bit Windows 7 & Windows XP. I run 4 operating systems on a single PC.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:32 PM
#12
Frenzied Member
lol i heard serveral variations of this lol but its all good 
~~~Dimava~~~
NXSupport - Your one-stop source for computer help
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:35 PM
#13
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by kedaman
well implicate anything in general, i mean an expression doesn't say anything to you unless it's applied in a context
Ah, that is about like asking what some text says. Since it doesn't speak, it says nothing.
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:37 PM
#14
transcendental analytic
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 21st, 2001, 02:43 PM
#15
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by kedaman
Yep you got me
See, Matthew. It tooks Gurus to determine that this expression does not imply anything, but that "1 + 1" can be evaluated to TRUE.
Can you tell that I'm sick of looking at my ASP for the day.
Travis, Kung Foo Journeyman
As always, RTFM.
WWW Standards: HTML 4.01, CSS Level 2, ECMA 262 Bindings to DOM Level 1, JavaScript 1.3 Guide and Reference
Perl: Learn Perl, Llama, Camel, Cookbook, Perl Monks, Perl Mongers, O'Reilly's Perl.com, ActiveState, CPAN, TPJ, and use Perl;
YBMS, but Mozilla doesn't.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote