View Poll Results: How long do you think it will take until the end of C++?
- Voters
- 21. You may not vote on this poll
-
I think it has died.
-
I think it will be out of use in a couple of years.
-
It's going to be in use for a lot of years to come.
-
C++ rulez and will NEVER die!!!
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 03:42 PM
#1
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 03:47 PM
#2
C++ will never die. Operating Systems can't be made in Java(Maybe someday but they'd be slower than all hell).
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 03:48 PM
#3
Member
*snicker* Rise of C#. The most dumbass retarted language.
Java is on the rise. With processor speeds so fast, speed isn't as major an issue as it was before. And this isn't a trash-Java thread, people, before you start.
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 03:53 PM
#4
Originally posted by filburt1
*snicker* Rise of C#. The most dumbass retarted language.
Java is on the rise. With processor speeds so fast, speed isn't as major an issue as it was before. And this isn't a trash-Java thread, people, before you start.
But will it replace C++?
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 03:54 PM
#5
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 03:55 PM
#6
Member
C# (pronounced "see sharp", by the way) is just MS's cheapass ripoff of Java.
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 04:06 PM
#7
I know that. (check out the first post again)
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 04:13 PM
#8
I like Java, but it could never replace C++ because JVM's are written in C++. But I did read that Java programmers will out number C++ programmers by next year
Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.
Take credit, not responsibility
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 04:15 PM
#9
Member
Probably true. Java (especially the upcoming JDK 1.4) will rock. But of course sombody's gotta write the virtual machine.
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:01 PM
#10
Monday Morning Lunatic
The VM would probably be written in C actually. It's a lot leaner and closer to the machine - you can pretty much compile C yourself if you had enough time. C++ is full of inserted bits of glue code.
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:01 PM
#11
If I'll want to apply for a programming job sometime, will I be pushed out of the way by, say, a Java programmer?
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:04 PM
#12
Why not learn Java, too? Its always good to have as many languages under your belt as possible. And if they push, push back.
Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.
Take credit, not responsibility
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:08 PM
#13
PowerPoster
Originally posted by crptcblade
I like Java, but it could never replace C++ because JVM's are written in C++. But I did read that Java programmers will out number C++ programmers by next year
I thought that the JVM was written in assembly?
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:10 PM
#14
Member
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:10 PM
#15
Monday Morning Lunatic
Definitely not.
Something like that is way to big to write in assembler. Perhaps bits of it were spot-optimised?
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:26 PM
#16
Parksie, you're as full'a *&^% as a Xmas Turkey. ANYTHING CAN be written in Assembler. As far as too big, you ever look at the operating system of a 360?
Now to tee off on C++, in word #$(%*&. I thought that C was a bulky and unnecessarily obscure language, primarily intended to act as a wall to keep non-tecno geeks out of programming. I'm not yet convinced I was wrong.
C++ sucks. It doesn't rule anything except toilet paper.
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:30 PM
#17
Originally posted by DerFarm
Parksie, you're as full'a *&^% as a Xmas Turkey. ANYTHING CAN be written in Assembler. As far as too big, you ever look at the operating system of a 360?
Now to tee off on C++, in word #$(%*&. I thought that C was a bulky and unnecessarily obscure language, primarily intended to act as a wall to keep non-tecno geeks out of programming. I'm not yet convinced I was wrong.
C++ sucks. It doesn't rule anything except toilet paper.
This outburst of lunacy is brought to you by Miles Long Nipple Implants...
When painfully erect nipples become a problem in your everyday life, reach for the implants that perk up smooth - Miles Long Nipple Implants. Available in regular and mint flavored

Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.
Take credit, not responsibility
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:31 PM
#18
Ok, OK it was too much. But Lord, I don't like C++
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 05:33 PM
#19
I'm not even going to ask what you think of VB, I might die
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 08:33 PM
#20
Frenzied Member
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 08:57 PM
#21
Fanatic Member
in the department i work in, Java is pretty popular. i guess they need it for the c00l stuff they're working on
mmm apple pie
-nabeel
Visit www.fragblast.com
Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system
(__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 08:58 PM
#22
Member
Originally posted by nabeels786
mmm apple pie
You okay? Been taking too many cough drops?
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 09:07 PM
#23
Fanatic Member
yeh im okay.
im high(per).....like a butterfly....so pretty...so pretty...
apple pie is good
Visit www.fragblast.com
Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system
(__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 09:17 PM
#24
-
Aug 17th, 2001, 10:34 PM
#25
-
Aug 18th, 2001, 01:03 AM
#26
transcendental analytic
If C++ dies, I will die with it.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 18th, 2001, 04:37 AM
#27
Monday Morning Lunatic
Originally posted by DerFarm
Parksie, you're as full'a *&^% as a Xmas Turkey. ANYTHING CAN be written in Assembler. As far as too big, you ever look at the operating system of a 360?
Now to tee off on C++, in word #$(%*&. I thought that C was a bulky and unnecessarily obscure language, primarily intended to act as a wall to keep non-tecno geeks out of programming. I'm not yet convinced I was wrong.
C++ sucks. It doesn't rule anything except toilet paper.
I'll take each point in turn...
1. Windows 2000 is millions of lines of C and C++ code. You want to write that in assembler from scratch? How big is the OS of a 360 then? I know things CAN be written in assembler, it's whether it's reasonable to.
2. C is *not* bulky. It is, in fact, one of the languages with the least overhead you can find. You can cut C programs down to almost the size it would be if you'd written it in assembler if you know what you're doing.
3. Hmmm.
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Aug 18th, 2001, 10:15 AM
#28
PowerPoster
Originally posted by parksie
3. Hmmm.
I dunno, toilet paper is pretty good...
-
Aug 19th, 2001, 10:20 PM
#29
Frenzied Member
Try writing a 3d game as complex as say quake in java. You'll be lucky to get 4 fps out of it. C++ doesnt have a VM, so its really low level. For some things, you ned that. OSes, 3d games, etc...
C++ might die in say a decade or so. You're pretty safe learning it 4 now.
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
-
Aug 19th, 2001, 11:06 PM
#30
Dazed Member
Hey how about that toilet paper! My a!# is itchy.
-
Aug 19th, 2001, 11:46 PM
#31
Frenzied Member
There you go
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 12:23 AM
#32
PowerPoster
use a good ide or learn how to type
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 03:41 AM
#33
Fanatic Member
Of course C++ will die, and anyone who disagrees is terminally blind.
I am not saying it will happen overnight, and it certainly wont be replaced with Java, but one day, C++ will be no more.
Or do you guys really think that C++ is the pinacle of development langauges. lol.
Iain, thats with an i by the way!
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 03:50 AM
#34
Monday Morning Lunatic
Every language will die, it's just that C will stick around for a long time Oh, and C++ does pretty well as well, considering the way it's been roughly stapled together
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 04:21 AM
#35
transcendental analytic
I won't believe C++ will die without a noise. Either it will evolve so that it can survive or another language will be built on it, there's true power in C++ that I can't find in other languages, especially not Java.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 06:51 AM
#36
Frenzied Member
Delphi seems to do pretty well. I don't like Pascal syntax much though.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 08:08 AM
#37
I agree with Mikesy( ), C is going to be around for a long time, what else are they going to write operating systems in?
As long as C is around, I'm pretty sure C++ is going to be around too.
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 08:32 AM
#38
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by HarryW
Delphi seems to do pretty well. I don't like Pascal syntax much though.
Do people still use Pascal!! Jeez....
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 08:40 AM
#39
Frenzied Member
Turbo Pascal is really just as good as C when it comes to speed and efficiency. Pascal was originally designed just to teach programing basics (that's why it's so strict, good habits and all that) but it actually turned out to be pretty useful.
Delphi uses Object Pascal, which is a little different but essentially the same. ADA is more or less the same (similar syntax) which is used a bit in some mission-critical type stuff that mustn't go wrong.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Aug 20th, 2001, 09:05 AM
#40
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by HarryW
Turbo Pascal is really just as good as C when it comes to speed and efficiency. Pascal was originally designed just to teach programing basics (that's why it's so strict, good habits and all that) but it actually turned out to be pretty useful.
Delphi uses Object Pascal, which is a little different but essentially the same. ADA is more or less the same (similar syntax) which is used a bit in some mission-critical type stuff that mustn't go wrong.
Damn...Im going to have to learn Pascal in school. Because of VB, i probably have a LOT of bad habits. lol VB lets you get away with almost anything. Spaces, capitalization etc.
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|