|
-
Apr 29th, 2000, 08:13 AM
#1
transcendental analytic
FOX:
Sorry, forgot your qwestion,
Well THGTTG is The bookseries of Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy, one o my favorites (by Douglas Adams)
GIB GNAB is the reversed thing to BIG BANG
SAM:
How Big In is the Univese?
U don't know if we can exceed c yet! Think about Warp engine, The definition is not trekky fantasy, pushing space forward while moving in it you will relatively exceed c, however I don't know how the heck we would accelerate to that speed in a reasonable time.
The atom is another universe
Wait an c. Science may have some more to tell us in those x years we have left.
TimeTravel
This is also something Science yet haven't prooved/disprooved.
CHOMB:
It's a bit hard for me to Disagree or Agree with you, but i have some comments and questions
1. What makes you believe in aliens? If they were messing it, are they ignoring us? Have u seen an alien?
2. It seems that this is one hard to proove/disproove and have comments on, For me, it's based up on so much air, I'm leaving this behind
3. Same thing. This theory really doesn't explain much, but it surely impress all
4. Telekinesis - Bullshit. I don't want to go into this either, it's a big area to explore for such a, for this universe, incompatible idea
5. Gives me thoughts about 5'th element. Also in the game Civilisation, a granary in every city.
The parallell universes thing is a interesting area. But it requires another definition for universe than i have given in my theory *ambiguous name detected* HEhe. Well I had this theory that everything is possible, as soon as you go to the correct universe. Like a prism divide up light in colours, universe splits up in infinite amount of parallell universes which by the dx of time again splits up in infinite amount of parallell universes raising in amount after bigbang, we could just have a remote control to jump between these and have a universe where everything is exactly as you want. This theory is huge.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|