View Poll Results: Verbally, how do YOU say this number: 32,767?
- Voters
- 23. You may not vote on this poll
-
Thirty-two, seven-sixty-seven
-
Thirty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty-seven
-
Three two seven six seven
-
Me can't read numbers.
-
Aug 7th, 2001, 05:57 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Psychology
There is a reason for this, I'll give it after I get a few votes...
-
Aug 7th, 2001, 06:07 PM
#2
-
Aug 7th, 2001, 06:07 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Aw, poor Dennis.
-
Aug 7th, 2001, 06:08 PM
#4
Me lied. Me can read only number 69.
-
Aug 7th, 2001, 06:12 PM
#5
Thread Starter
Member
Me can read the number 666.
-
Aug 7th, 2001, 10:21 PM
#6
okie dokie
what was the reason fillyburty guy?
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 02:00 AM
#7
The correct way is...
Thirty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty-seven
but i say 32272, I always get them mixed up
what about
drei, zwei, sebien, sechs, sebien
damn i cant do german to save my life, and what the heck was i doing in that german class for 5 years!?!?
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 02:23 AM
#8
null
eins
zwei
drei
vier
fuenf
sechs
sieben
acht
neun
zehn
elf
zwoelf
dreizehn
vierzehn
fuenfzehn
sechzehn
siebzehn
actzehn
neunzehn
zwanzig
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 02:26 AM
#9
zweiunddreizig thousand siebenhundert siebundsechzig
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 02:33 AM
#10
Fanatic Member
Are you in this forum for a holiday or for Reconnaissance?
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 02:35 AM
#11
ahh, I just spelt 7 wrong, I can speak numbers in german up to very high values, just cant spell any
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 09:42 AM
#12
Hyperactive Member
I'm useless at spelling in other languages too. But then all my language teachers were scary (reckon they were in a cult or something) so I have an excuse.
BTW, about the numbers thing. I go for option 2
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 10:33 AM
#13
Fanatic Member
Treinta y dos mil setecientos sesenta y siete
And that, my friends, is why Spanish speakers talk so fast 
Let's get it in as many languages as possible.
Alcohol & calculus don't mix.
Never drink & derive.
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 10:49 AM
#14
Addicted Member
polish
trzydziesci dwa tysiace siedemset szescdziesiat siedem
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:12 AM
#15
Thread Starter
Member
Re: okie dokie
Originally posted by Jimmy Changas
what was the reason fillyburty guy?
Me back, Net access to any server on port 80 (i.e., a web server) was down UNTIL NOW! 
The answer:
Most programmers tend to say thirty-two seven sixty seven. While Thirty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty seven is the correct way, the other way is the maximum value for a signed integer in C, C++ and Visual Basic (in Java, it is called "short"). As this number is used CONSTANTLY while determing how to declare a number, most programmers tend to say it that way.
This is, of course, my own theory...but I have asked people at work and family members this same question, and the programmers tend to say 32 7 67. Although, according to the poll, no one in Chit Chat is a programmer. 
Any comments?
Last edited by filburt1; Aug 8th, 2001 at 11:35 AM.
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:36 AM
#16
Thread Starter
Member
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:36 AM
#17
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by Wynd
Let's get it in as many languages as possible.
Amen! Oh...wait...you meant the numbers didn't you?..............nevermind
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:40 AM
#18
Fanatic Member
None of the above:
Thirty-two thousand seven hundred sixty-seven
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:41 AM
#19
Thread Starter
Member
Technically true, but read my explanation three posts up...
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:46 AM
#20
Hyperactive Member
Afrikaans
Drie duisend seve honderd seve en sestig
Last edited by marnitzg; Aug 8th, 2001 at 11:50 AM.
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:46 AM
#21
New Member
Tretti-to tusen, sju-hundre og seksti-sju.
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 11:49 AM
#22
Thread Starter
Member
ŽO\“ñç, ޵•S˜Z\޵ (Chinese, according to Babelfish )
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 12:09 PM
#23
transcendental analytic
kuusitoistamiljoonaseitsemänsataaseitsemänkymmentäseitsemäntuhattakaksisataakuusitoista
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 12:12 PM
#24
transcendental analytic
okay that was 2^24 not 2^15-1
kolmekymmentäkaksituhattaseitsemänsataakuusikymmentäseitsemän
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Aug 8th, 2001, 12:13 PM
#25
Thread Starter
Member
English: 32,767
Spanish: 32.767
German: 32.767
Chinese...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|