View Poll Results: Verbally, how do YOU say this number: 32,767?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Thirty-two, seven-sixty-seven

    1 4.35%
  • Thirty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty-seven

    21 91.30%
  • Three two seven six seven

    0 0%
  • Me can't read numbers.

    1 4.35%
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Psychology

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935

    Psychology

    There is a reason for this, I'll give it after I get a few votes...

  2. #2
    denniswrenn
    Guest
    Me can't read numbers.

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935
    Aw, poor Dennis.

  4. #4
    denniswrenn
    Guest
    Me lied. Me can read only number 69.

  5. #5

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935
    Me can read the number 666.

  6. #6
    Jimmy Changas
    Guest

    okie dokie

    what was the reason fillyburty guy?

  7. #7
    chenko
    Guest
    The correct way is...

    Thirty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty-seven

    but i say 32272, I always get them mixed up

    what about

    drei, zwei, sebien, sechs, sebien

    damn i cant do german to save my life, and what the heck was i doing in that german class for 5 years!?!?

  8. #8
    denniswrenn
    Guest
    null
    eins
    zwei
    drei
    vier
    fuenf
    sechs
    sieben
    acht
    neun
    zehn
    elf
    zwoelf
    dreizehn
    vierzehn
    fuenfzehn
    sechzehn
    siebzehn
    actzehn
    neunzehn
    zwanzig

  9. #9
    denniswrenn
    Guest
    zweiunddreizig thousand siebenhundert siebundsechzig

  10. #10
    Fanatic Member chrismitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    With Hobbes in New Zealand
    Posts
    568
    Are you in this forum for a holiday or for Reconnaissance?

  11. #11
    chenko
    Guest
    ahh, I just spelt 7 wrong, I can speak numbers in german up to very high values, just cant spell any

  12. #12
    Hyperactive Member Pix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    I'm not telling you (or them)
    Posts
    282
    I'm useless at spelling in other languages too. But then all my language teachers were scary (reckon they were in a cult or something) so I have an excuse.

    BTW, about the numbers thing. I go for option 2

  13. #13
    Fanatic Member Wynd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    In a bar frequented by colossal death robots
    Posts
    772
    Treinta y dos mil setecientos sesenta y siete

    And that, my friends, is why Spanish speakers talk so fast

    Let's get it in as many languages as possible.
    Alcohol & calculus don't mix.
    Never drink & derive.

  14. #14
    Addicted Member ShIzO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Bartlett, IL
    Posts
    189

    polish

    trzydziesci dwa tysiace siedemset szescdziesiat siedem

    www.HardFind.com -buy/sell/trade your used hardware.

  15. #15

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935

    Re: okie dokie

    Originally posted by Jimmy Changas
    what was the reason fillyburty guy?
    Me back, Net access to any server on port 80 (i.e., a web server) was down UNTIL NOW!

    The answer:

    Most programmers tend to say thirty-two seven sixty seven. While Thirty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty seven is the correct way, the other way is the maximum value for a signed integer in C, C++ and Visual Basic (in Java, it is called "short"). As this number is used CONSTANTLY while determing how to declare a number, most programmers tend to say it that way.

    This is, of course, my own theory...but I have asked people at work and family members this same question, and the programmers tend to say 32 7 67. Although, according to the poll, no one in Chit Chat is a programmer.

    Any comments?
    Last edited by filburt1; Aug 8th, 2001 at 11:35 AM.

  16. #16

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935
    *bump

  17. #17
    Hyperactive Member barrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    My own little world
    Posts
    274
    Originally posted by Wynd
    Let's get it in as many languages as possible.
    Amen! Oh...wait...you meant the numbers didn't you?..............nevermind

  18. #18
    Fanatic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    962
    None of the above:

    Thirty-two thousand seven hundred sixty-seven

  19. #19

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935
    Technically true, but read my explanation three posts up...

  20. #20
    Hyperactive Member marnitzg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    372

    Afrikaans

    Drie duisend seve honderd seve en sestig
    Last edited by marnitzg; Aug 8th, 2001 at 11:50 AM.

  21. #21
    New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12
    Tretti-to tusen, sju-hundre og seksti-sju.

  22. #22

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935
    ŽO\“ñç, ޵•S˜Z\޵ (Chinese, according to Babelfish )

  23. #23
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    kuusitoistamiljoonaseitsemänsataaseitsemänkymmentäseitsemäntuhattakaksisataakuusitoista
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  24. #24
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221

    okay that was 2^24 not 2^15-1

    kolmekymmentäkaksituhattaseitsemänsataakuusikymmentäseitsemän
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  25. #25

    Thread Starter
    Member filburt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,935
    English: 32,767
    Spanish: 32.767
    German: 32.767
    Chinese...


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width