|
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 12:09 PM
#1
Thread Starter
PowerPoster
I got VIRUS
Anyone ever had a file named "ldkbghnq.exe" in the Windows folder? It's a virus, I currently just replaced it with a empty exe I made...
Anyways, I'd like to know how to get rid of this virus, I think it's also hooked to some of my exe files..
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 12:16 PM
#2
Member
You DO have an anti-virus, right?
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 12:19 PM
#3
Frenzied Member
Originally posted by filburt1
You DO have an anti-virus, right?
I don't
which one should i get?
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 12:21 PM
#4
Member
Norton Antivirus 2001. DON'T GET THAT MCAFFE VIRUSSCAN CRAP! I don't like it.
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:24 PM
#5
Monday Morning Lunatic
I use AVG and it's caught everything I threw at it, including that new Sircam one - it got that before I know it was out, which is pretty good.
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:32 PM
#6
do you know what virus tha tis. I can't find anyhting on it
and Norton SUCKS. it is not very user friendly and it runs wierd. personal opinion though.
McAffe rules
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:41 PM
#7
Member
http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/fil...id,4030,00.asp for Norton Antivirus 2001
And McAfee:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,36863,00.asp
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,33982,00.asp
I own Norton Antivirus 2001. It is the easiest to use interface I have seen in an antivirus. And justify why it "runs weird."
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:42 PM
#8
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:43 PM
#9
McAffee SUCKS! Hotmail uses McAffee, and I got the SirCam virus(didn't get infected though) and hotmail didn't even detect it. IMO AVP, and Norton are the best.
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:51 PM
#10
it runs wierd is becasue everybody that I know that uses it said they have problems and I don't like the way it switches screens to scan and when it finds a virus. reminds to much like BSoD.
I have never had a problem with McAfee in the 4 years I have used it. like I said it is a personal opinion as others have not had a problem with norton.
it is like the ford and chevy thing, personal opinion.
Dennis maybe you got it because Microsoft didn't update there dat files. I am protected agains the SirCam virus, because I updated the dat files.
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 02:56 PM
#11
Member
I've never had a problem with NORTON in *6* years, and it has caught dozens of viruses, worms, etc.
Don't forget to get a firewall like ZoneAlarm! (Don't start trashing ZoneAlarm, I have TONS of links for it)
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 03:00 PM
#12
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 03:08 PM
#13
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 03:28 PM
#14
Thread Starter
PowerPoster
AVG? is that free? or tell me the full name, anyone?
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 03:37 PM
#15
sophos AV is good
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 04:39 PM
#16
ZoneAlarm is better than AtGuard... Mike told me that when you allow/disallow a program to do something, AtGuard only recognizes it by it's name; Another program could have the same name and do bad stuff. ZoneAlarm uses the contents of the program to decide whether or not to let it be...
I use AtGuard though, 'cause it's already installed and I'm waaaaaaaaaay too lazy to download and install ZoneAlarm.....
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 05:26 PM
#17
Fanatic Member
avg have a free version, that you can use, i use it all the time and it is bloody good, goto www.grisoft.com
I think that Sophos is a little pricy, though i hear god reports about it
Some people have told me they don't think a fat penguin really embodies the grace of Linux, which just tells me they have never seen a angry penguin charging at them in excess of 100mph. They'd be a lot more careful about what they say if they had.
-- Linus Torvalds
[ Galahtech.com] | [ My Site] | [ Fishsponge] | [ UnixForum.co.uk]
-
Jul 24th, 2001, 05:29 PM
#18
that might be but I have the full version and I don't want to uninstall it, like you said I'm too lazy 
beside I have had that problem (yet)
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 06:11 AM
#19
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by chenko
sophos AV is good
Sophos gets on my bloody wick. I've known it to trash a few installations because it's kicked in after the system rebooted.
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 06:39 AM
#20
PowerPoster
Yeah i agree with Scoutt!
Mcafee is great. Even better coz we get it for free. My boss knows some head honcho at mcafee.
The reason my work mate got sircam is becuase she didnt keep her virus files updated!
Also dennis it probably got through hotmail is maybe the same reason hotmail staff.
Or perhaps because it attaches itself to a file which is the attachment!!! So the virus aint the attachment really.
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 07:36 AM
#21
Member
Originally posted by Beacon
Yeah i agree with Scoutt!
Mcafee is great. Even better coz we get it for free. My boss knows some head honcho at mcafee.
The reason my work mate got sircam is becuase she didnt keep her virus files updated!
Also dennis it probably got through hotmail is maybe the same reason hotmail staff.
Or perhaps because it attaches itself to a file which is the attachment!!! So the virus aint the attachment really.
Once again, McAfee sucks. Didn't you read those links I posted? It even found a virus in a program I created when one didn't exist! That pissed me off, what would my users do when they download my proggie!?
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 08:56 AM
#22
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 08:58 AM
#23
origianlly posted by filburt1
Once again, McAfee sucks. Didn't you read those links I posted? It even found a virus in a program I created when one didn't exist! That pissed me off, what would my users do when they download my proggie!?
it isn't just McAffe that finds virus from that kind of stuff. I just downloaded Winace, it is like winzip, and they said that it might trigger your virus scanner because of the compression they used in the exe. in order to have a good virus scanner you have to look at everything and suspect eveything.
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 09:00 AM
#24
Member
True. I respect your opinion about McAfee if you respect mine about Norton. Deal?
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 09:10 AM
#25
Deal 
that's cool, I always said it was a personal opinion. they can't be all that bad for staying in business all these years. I just don't like them.
-
Jul 25th, 2001, 09:26 AM
#26
Member
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|