View Poll Results: Should there be signatire limits
- Voters
- 50. You may not vote on this poll
-
Jul 1st, 2001, 12:53 AM
#16
Hyperactive Member
Yeah Chris, it's annoying, but it isn't the end of the world. There's a lot more things going on in the world to get annoyed about. Sig length isn't one of them.
I like this forum because people can post whatever they want. Why should my personal preferences be forced upon another person. Yes, some of the sigs are a bit large, but I can live with that, it isn't going to cause me half as much worry as pollution, crime, racism, sectarianisim, poverty, religion, price of petrol, MP's salary's etc. In the greater scheme of things it's something that is very minor.
I have gone through 3 ISO 9000 audits with various companies. For those of you who have never had this "joy", ISO 9000 is the standard which basically says there should be rules for everything. It sucks more than a $100 *****. If we start introducing rules, (which new members are supposed to know) then we end up in a boring dead end forum.
I say leave people to there own devices. If someone annoys you with there sig, then you can ignore them (using the option provided).
Chimp's signature is a pathetic attempt to raise hatred against a group of people. If he thought that long sig's where such a great crime, then who gave him the right to be the exception to the rule. This is the equivelent of someone going drink-driving and killing someone to highlight how bad drink drivers are.....
.... except that the cause he is championing is so minor that it would be more like me going round whistleing tunelessly to highlight how tuneless people shouldn't be allowed to whistle in public...
Just me 2c
SD
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|