I don't vote for any of them since they all are against perfection, but on the other hand i don't care either since they all work to evolve perfection in "near" future.

Simon i was to write this after i read Guv's post but you mentioned it already Science vs Religion is an incompatible comparation. They do explain and bring up theories but in totally different scope. I'm sure most adopt science as reality but a lot of them also adopt a religion and live with the contradictions, by not caring. I don't care either but i'm not adopting any and stays sceptical. This is basically because the scope of religions are usually on a more lowlevel resolution, handling macroscopical theories and axioms that don't subclass what is visible. Science reverse engineers microscopical, visibile, highlevel axioms to conclude lower level theorems, which sounds reasonable but is in fact illogical, and yet there is no universal explanation to our existance, the basics of the language of reality.