|
-
Feb 2nd, 2010, 04:42 PM
#1
Palin is losing it
Yahoo story cites Rahm Emanuel as using the "R" word,
as in "retarded", in a closed door session, which then prompted
a criticism by the Wonder-Woman, sarah palin, who has
a son with Down syndrome.
The actual Emanuel phrase was "f---ing retarded".
Interestingly, palin didn't object to the "F" word.
Man, is she a DingBat or what?
-
Feb 2nd, 2010, 06:08 PM
#2
Frenzied Member
Re: Palin is losing it
Why didn't he just call the democrats 'tards'? It would have been less offensive than calling an idea retarded.
-
Feb 2nd, 2010, 06:20 PM
#3
Re: Palin is losing it
True enough. That word is being morphed into all kinds of oddities. If one is stricken from the language (fortunately, we don't have many manual choke devices around anymore), do we also have to stop saying mactard?
My usual boring signature: Nothing
 
-
Feb 2nd, 2010, 07:18 PM
#4
Re: Palin is losing it
Wasn't the actual phrase was "e ff in retarded"?
Everything that has a computer in will fail. Everything in your life, from a watch to a car to, you know, a radio, to an iPhone, it will fail if it has a computer in it. They should kill the people who made those things.- 'Woz'
save a blobFileStreamDataTable To Text Filemy blog
-
Feb 5th, 2010, 04:56 PM
#5
Re: Palin is losing it
Haha.. this could start to get interesting.
Now Palin is tangling with Flush Limbaugh for using
the same R word, as detailed in this Yahoo article.
Will Palin have the nads to remain consistently critical
of the use of the word, or will she collapse and say
its ok for Flush to use it, but not for Rahm to use it?
(Hopefully I won't get flagged for using the N word)
Stay tuned...
-
Feb 5th, 2010, 05:01 PM
#6
Re: Palin is losing it
Isn't the real question who gives a crap about what some former vice presidential candidate (who was never qualified for that job in the first place) thinks at all????
There is not one thing in this world you can say or do without offending someone, so who really cares at all???
(note, if my post offended you, I don't care )
-
Feb 5th, 2010, 11:02 PM
#7
Frenzied Member
Re: Palin is losing it
 Originally Posted by Spoo
Will Palin have the nads to remain consistently critical
of the use of the word, or will she collapse and say
its ok for Flush to use it, but not for Rahm to use it?
.
Palin doesn't have the nads to tangle with Limbaugh just like president Osama doesn't have the nads to tangle with Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh for President...
-
Feb 6th, 2010, 04:19 AM
#8
Hyperactive Member
Re: Palin is losing it
Technically, there's nothing there to lose.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|