|
-
Sep 8th, 2009, 03:57 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
.NET Assembly with COM compatibility problems
I have . VB.NET DLL that I have made COM visible and it works fine.
However, I've now added another class which I also want to expose to COM but I am now getting an erro when I build it:
Error 1 The assembly {...} could not be converted to a type library. Type library exporter encountered an error while processing 'TOPSMileageLookup.JobMileage, TOPSMileageLookup'. Error: Type 'JobMileage' and type 'Job' both have the same UUID.
JobMileage is the name of the original class I had that is COM visible and it worked fine when it was on it's own. Job is the name of the new class.
Now, the obvious suspician is that I have copied over my COM GUID's but I can assure you that they are most certainly different. But what else could it be?
Last edited by simonm; Sep 8th, 2009 at 05:14 AM.
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Sep 8th, 2009, 09:38 AM
#2
Re: .NET Assembly with COM compatibility problems
Hmm ... that does sound like the build thinks the GUID is the same.
Have you tried doing a solution "clean"? Do that and a "rebuild" (rather than a build). It might be that an earlier build registered this guy for COM but the new one (with the new function) has a different interface but is trying to register it under the same GUID. The "clean" operation should unregister the COM interface before doing the rebuild.
-Max
The name's "Peck" .... "Max Peck"
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." - Red Adair
-
Sep 8th, 2009, 10:07 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
Re: .NET Assembly with COM compatibility problems
I've tried doing a rebuild, but with the same result.
I've also tried changing the GUID's of the original class but again with no beneficial result.
I'm at a loss for what to try. Does anyone know if there's a limit to how many classes .NET allows to be COM visible (and this is it's round about way of telling me)?
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|