|
-
May 25th, 2009, 03:31 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Parameterization
I have the line integral
\int y sin(x) i -cos(x) j
Over (0,1) (pi,-1) and I want to make the integral a function of a single value t.
Can someone please check my Parameterization
I'm using the Parameterization
r(t) = (1-t)(x0,y0) + t(x1,y1)
= (1-t)(0,1)+t(pi,-1)
= pi t 1-2t
so
x = pi t therefore x'(t) = pi
y = 1-2t therefore y'(t) = -2
regards
-
May 25th, 2009, 01:07 PM
#2
Re: Parameterization
That parametrization is great, I didn't see any mistakes. Just to be clear, your integrand is a conservative vector field, so a parametrization doesn't matter if you're only interested in computing the integral.
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.
Bertrand Russell
<- Remember to rate posts you find helpful.
-
May 26th, 2009, 12:31 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Re: Parameterization
Because it is a conservative vector field I can use the potentail function.
I've calculated that as being
phi (x,y) = y-cos(x)
So if I plug in the values for
int F = phi (x1,y1)-phi (x0,y0)
That equals -1-cos(pi) - 1-cos(0)
= -2
I also had to compute it by another means so I tried my luck at the parameterization method because I definately need the practice.
-
May 26th, 2009, 01:03 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Re: Parameterization
But I'm not sure if thats right because when I calculate by
\int f(t)x'(t)+g(t)y'(t) from 0 to 1
I get
(1-2t) sin(pi t)*(pi) + -cos(pi t)*(-2) from 0 to 1
= 0
So is
phi (x,y) = y-cos(x)
The right potential function ?
Not sure where I'm going wrong
-
May 26th, 2009, 01:08 AM
#5
Re: Parameterization
Your potential function should be "-y cos(x)" not "y-cos(x)"; the negative sign seems to be throwing you off. With the proper function, the integral becomes
int F = phi (x1,y1)-phi (x0,y0) = +1cos(pi) + 1cos(0) = -1 + 1 = 0.
I didn't check the brute force path integral you gave because the results appear to match regardless .
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.
Bertrand Russell
<- Remember to rate posts you find helpful.
-
May 26th, 2009, 04:40 AM
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Re: Parameterization
Your right.
I should have gone back to the start. I checked my paper work and I had it incorrect all along.
Thankyou
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|