|
-
Mar 21st, 2009, 02:51 PM
#1
a tinfoil hat is not enough!
I don't live here any more.
-
Mar 21st, 2009, 08:22 PM
#2
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
Hunt and peck may serve a function here.
My usual boring signature: Nothing
 
-
Mar 21st, 2009, 10:11 PM
#3
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
Actually, wouldn't it be better in this case to be an extremely fast typist who makes lots of mistakes?
-
Mar 21st, 2009, 10:46 PM
#4
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
Great 
You think 2 steps ahead of them.
-
Mar 21st, 2009, 11:06 PM
#5
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
A fast, but really bad, typist would be hard to figure out. Of course, anybody who types leet speak is hard to figure out anyways. Coders would be impossible, since most of what we type would fit the criteria for strong passwords.
A Dvorsak keyboard ought to be pretty rough on them, too.
My usual boring signature: Nothing
 
-
Mar 22nd, 2009, 12:01 AM
#6
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
Interesting point, they would have to determine first what the keyboard layout is.
-
Mar 22nd, 2009, 01:13 AM
#7
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
if they are close enough to shine a laser directly on your keyboard, they have probably seen your layout. And the detecting pulses in electric lines one would not be affected at all by keyboard layouts.
In my opinion a slow accurate typist would probably be harder because according to the article they would have less of a sample of keypresses to work with.
-
Mar 22nd, 2009, 07:21 AM
#8
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
The keyboard layout is irrelevant. You can simply associate a sound with a letter by using character frequency analysis ("e" is the most common letter followed by "s","t"... at least in English).
Interesting that the oscilloscope method only works for PS2 keyboards. No matter, USB 1.1 is susceptible to bus-sniffing if you can gain access to at least one of the target machine's USB hubs.
I don't live here any more.
-
Mar 22nd, 2009, 09:24 AM
#9
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
 Originally Posted by Lord Orwell
In my opinion a slow accurate typist would probably be harder because according to the article they would have less of a sample of keypresses to work with.
I would say that it has to do with whether or not the bad typist correct their mistakes. If the aodhtp just letg theiwr vifngers wander on the keywobard without doinge andy docresctions, then they would be mighty hard to understand, even if you saw the actual result.
My usual boring signature: Nothing
 
-
Mar 22nd, 2009, 04:52 PM
#10
Hyperactive Member
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
Late in the conversation but this is old news for me: during research into organisational monitoring policies last year I became aware that a university research team had identified the sound of every individual keystroke to the extent that they had applied a 99 percent absolute correction of key identification.
Kind regards
Steve
-
Mar 23rd, 2009, 08:01 AM
#11
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!
No matter, USB 1.1 is susceptible to bus-sniffing
I tried bus sniffing once. It was bloody hard to get it to fit on the mirror.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill
Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd
-
Mar 23rd, 2009, 11:06 AM
#12
Re: a tinfoil hat is not enough!

When you sniff bus, you don't just hurt yourself, you inconvenience those around you.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|