Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: SQL Server database Implementation . . .

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Software Carpenter dee-u's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Pinas
    Posts
    11,127

    Re: SQL Server database Implementation . . .

    If it would have been in a multi-user environment then I would have suggested alternatives to Access but if it is a single-user application then Access should be fine in most cases, one scenario that I would advise against using it (in a single user case) is when the database should exceed the limit of its 2GB size.
    Regards,


    As a gesture of gratitude please consider rating helpful posts. c",)

    Some stuffs: Mouse Hotkey | Compress file using SQL Server! | WPF - Rounded Combobox | WPF - Notify Icon and Balloon | NetVerser - a WPF chatting system

  2. #2
    PowerPoster RhinoBull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Amsterdam
    Posts
    24,132

    Re: SQL Server database Implementation . . .

    MS Access was fine when we had no alternatives - we now have free express editions of MS SQL, Oracle and of course MySql that make MS Access look "crippled".
    Would you want your app to be crippled? I'm sure your answer is "no".

  3. #3
    Software Carpenter dee-u's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Pinas
    Posts
    11,127

    Re: SQL Server database Implementation . . .

    We have our own beliefs and opinions on things. I'd say Access is still fine if it fits the requirement, and the application that utilizes it shouldn't be crippled if it is designed correctly. Cheers everyone!
    Regards,


    As a gesture of gratitude please consider rating helpful posts. c",)

    Some stuffs: Mouse Hotkey | Compress file using SQL Server! | WPF - Rounded Combobox | WPF - Notify Icon and Balloon | NetVerser - a WPF chatting system

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width