|
-
Oct 11th, 2008, 02:26 AM
#1
Sturdier processor: AMD vs Intel
It is a 'fact' that AMD processors are cheaper than their Intel counterparts but can it cope and outlast Intel processors? I mean are they sturdy enough?
-
Oct 11th, 2008, 06:58 AM
#2
Not NoteMe
Re: Sturdier processor: AMD vs Intel
I've got an Athlon XP 2000+ as my main computer, and when i got it, it was fairly new (so around 6 years old i think) and i've had zero problems, so i'd say this one at least is very reliable.
Quotes:
"I am getting better then you guys.." NoteMe, on his leet english skills.
"And I am going to meat her again later on tonight." NoteMe
"I think you should change your name to QuoteMe" Shaggy Hiker, regarding NoteMe
"my sweet lord jesus. I've decided never to have breast implants" Tom Gibbons
Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts. 
-
Oct 13th, 2008, 07:47 AM
#3
Re: Sturdier processor: AMD vs Intel
i've never had either one crap out on me (except this one time when i didn't have the heat sink mounted)
If you want longevity though, don't buy the top of the line one of either brand. It's running at nearly max tolerance and the slightly cheaper ones have room to spare in their operation, meaning that they aren't being stressed. And frankly the prices of the processors on the top-end are nearly equal nowadays anyway. The difference in price of a system is no longer because of the processor. For some reason Intel-compatible motherboards are much more expensive. I suspect it's because of the memory controller. AMD has it on-chip.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|