I stand corrected, you are perhaps the most amazing talent this planet has ever been privelidged to behold. Your finesse and subtlety of clock manipulation is second to none, and I bow to your superiority.
I suppose i should have taken a bigger picture but these were the last posts on each of the 7 forums in the section Visual Basic so me thinks that is a little better. Thats why the times may be confusing you.
in a world where the sun always shines on the bloody tv!!
Posts
604
Originally posted by chrisjk Unfortunately, you have been beaten by Kedaman who managed the top 10 (which I, as independent adjudicator) have verified.
Some people have told me they don't think a fat penguin really embodies the grace of Linux, which just tells me they have never seen a angry penguin charging at them in excess of 100mph. They'd be a lot more careful about what they say if they had.
-- Linus Torvalds
Originally posted by chrisjk Unfortunately, you have been beaten by Kedaman who managed the top 10 (which I, as independent adjudicator) have verified.
well my old record was over 10, i think it was 12, but ive beaten it again
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
btw, any luck with the genetic algoritm application?
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
GA is not the answer for what you were expecting(I know..b'cos I read the other Thread!).
GA is just an Algorithm to Get an Optimum solution in a set of possible solutions. And NOTE GA will not always give you the Exact - correct Solution, Just the Optimum solution among them.
It is most useful when the Solution to your problem varies
non-linearly with variation of the Participating parameters.
Similarly Simulated Annealing does the same. To use them you should have some way of finding If a particular value has a good chance of being the optimum solution( fitness ).
In Plain sense GA is just Selective Iteration.
Reply With Quote
