|
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 12:51 AM
#1
Thread Starter
WiggleWiggle
The Exorcist
Has anyone seen it? I am about to watch it. I heard it was like, the scariest movie ever.
My usual boring signature: Something
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 01:15 AM
#2
Re: The Exorcist
General population desensitization does not allow for it to be as scary as it may have been in the past.
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 01:19 AM
#3
Re: The Exorcist
 Originally Posted by dclamp
Has anyone seen it? I am about to watch it. I heard it was like, the scariest movie ever.
It is remarkably similar to the scariest movie ever, yes. Although I would venture that it is not identical. They are merely, like, alike.
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 01:29 AM
#4
Re: The Exorcist
Did those people also let you know how Nixon was the best president ever? Perhaps they mentioned how relieved they are that Manson is finally behind bars? Or maybe they also told you about that talented, young buck Barry Manilow?
Stop hanging out in retirement homes dclamp.
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 02:49 AM
#5
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
 Originally Posted by dclamp
Has anyone seen it? I am about to watch it. I heard it was like, the scariest movie ever.
Not the scariest but briliant film!
Has anyone seen vacancy, that turned out to be really scary! Have a watch of that if you get the chance!
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 06:46 AM
#6
Re: The Exorcist
I loved the concept for vacancy but the film itself turned about to be about as scary as Rod, Jane and Freddy.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill
Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 07:39 AM
#7
Fanatic Member
Re: The Exorcist
No, but I have seen Exorcist 2. That was just hilarious. I'd recommend that film to anybody if they want to see how to make a magnificently bad sequel.
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 07:51 AM
#8
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
 Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
I loved the concept for vacancy but the film itself turned about to be about as scary as Rod, Jane and Freddy.
Perhaps i scare easy. I still thought it was a good film...Its unlike most horror films out today that just use shock techniques to make you jump. At least it built tension and had a good plot! Ending wasn't the best.
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 07:52 AM
#9
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
 Originally Posted by kregg
No, but I have seen Exorcist 2. That was just hilarious. I'd recommend that film to anybody if they want to see how to make a magnificently bad sequel.
Is that the one where the priest finds some old fossil at the start...I think that might be exorsist 3, its awful!!
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:00 AM
#10
Fanatic Member
Re: The Exorcist
Maybe it was 2. It was about locusts...
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:08 AM
#11
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
Im gonna find out what im talking about and get back to you...Wait there!
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:09 AM
#12
Fanatic Member
Re: The Exorcist
*Waits in the same spot for either an answer or someone to run him over*
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:11 AM
#13
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
Arr, think im talking about this crap.
Should probably start a new tread but, in my opinion, the best horror film is 'The Devils Rejects'....One of the best endings to a film you will see!
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:14 AM
#14
Fanatic Member
Re: The Exorcist
I guess the power of crap compells the directors to make sequels after sequels.
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:16 AM
#15
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
Its pretty amazing isnt it! They made one good film and then continued to make 4 other bad ones. One film sequence that does break the mode and just keeps knocking out good film after good film....Nighmare on Elm Street. I have all 7!!!!
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:22 AM
#16
Fanatic Member
Re: The Exorcist
I remember hearing about that when I was young, but tbh I'm not really into scary films as they are very unrealistic.
Take for example Saw. There is a scene where the guy has to run through barbed wire (for god knows what reason). The amount of barbed wire there must've been very hard to obtain in real life. I mean can you imagine a parcel from UPS - "Handle with care, several kilometres of barbed wire encased"??
And last but not least, the main psycho in the film had brain cancer, and thought he should teach everyone a lesson... Maybe that cancer really got inside his head...
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 08:26 AM
#17
Hyperactive Member
Re: The Exorcist
 Originally Posted by kregg
Take for example Saw. There is a scene where the guy has to run through barbed wire (for god knows what reason). The amount of barbed wire there must've been very hard to obtain in real life. I mean can you imagine a parcel from UPS - "Handle with care, several kilometres of barbed wire encased"??
And last but not least, the main psycho in the film had brain cancer, and thought he should teach everyone a lesson... Maybe that cancer really got inside his head...
This i can't argue with...Saw was good until they made, 2,3,4 and i think 5. Rather horrific at times though and i spose thats how they grab their audiance!
Kregg, you must have seen at least Nightmare on Elm Street 1. You know, Freddie Kurger and all that?!
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 11:57 AM
#18
Re: The Exorcist
Saw only goes up to 4 and I shudder with horror at the thought they might make a fifth. the first one's excellent but the rest (particularly 3) just go for the sick angle with no real intelligence.
Thinking back to Vacancy, the first half's really quite good (if a little corny), especially the creepy guy at the checkin whose clearly based on Norman Bates. It's the second half when the local yokels start attacking them that was rubbish. It was like watching the end of a Benny Hill episode.
Oh, and you're right: Freddie Rules, baby, yeah!
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill
Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd
-
Jul 18th, 2008, 03:11 PM
#19
Fanatic Member
Re: The Exorcist
 Originally Posted by FunkyDexter
the first one's excellent but the rest (particularly 3) just go for the sick angle with no real intelligence.
Are you joking? The first one had anything but intelligence. The guy went around killing people because he had some sort of cancer in his brain at one point. And lets face it, the detectives aren't exactly the brightest lot.
"Oh gee! The killer is getting away in an alleyway, and the alleyway has a piece of string at the bottom with lots of guns attached at the top. Let's see what would happen when I run into them?"
And let's not forget that stupid, idiotic doll. Yes, that little doll that looks like it has more makeup than Victoria Beckham and (senselessly) spiraly red cheeks. And I'm talking about this thing:

Honestly, it would've been scarier if the killer sneezed at the photographer than actually threw that doll at him.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|