|
-
Jul 2nd, 2008, 02:22 AM
#1
Thread Starter
WiggleWiggle
count() vs. mysql_num_rows()
They give the same result, so which one is better/faster to use?
My usual boring signature: Something
-
Jul 2nd, 2008, 03:11 AM
#2
Re: count() vs. mysql_num_rows()
Depends upon your needs/use.
Note: If you already have a $result, use mysql_num_rows() on it otherwise use SQL count(). Don't SELECT data just for a count.
VB/Office Guru™ (AKA: Gangsta Yoda™ ®)
I dont answer coding questions via PM. Please post a thread in the appropriate forum. 
Microsoft MVP 2006-2011
Office Development FAQ (C#, VB.NET, VB 6, VBA)
Senior Jedi Software Engineer MCP (VB 6 & .NET), BSEE, CET
If a post has helped you then Please Rate it! 
• Reps & Rating Posts • VS.NET on Vista • Multiple .NET Framework Versions • Office Primary Interop Assemblies • VB/Office Guru™ Word SpellChecker™.NET • VB/Office Guru™ Word SpellChecker™ VB6 • VB.NET Attributes Ex. • Outlook Global Address List • API Viewer utility • .NET API Viewer Utility •
System: Intel i7 6850K, Geforce GTX1060, Samsung M.2 1 TB & SATA 500 GB, 32 GBs DDR4 3300 Quad Channel RAM, 2 Viewsonic 24" LCDs, Windows 10, Office 2016, VS 2019, VB6 SP6 
-
Jul 2nd, 2008, 04:46 AM
#3
Re: count() vs. mysql_num_rows()
SQL count or PHP count? I believe the latter calls mysql_num_rows internally when passed a MySQL result set.
-
Jul 2nd, 2008, 01:37 PM
#4
Thread Starter
WiggleWiggle
Re: count() vs. mysql_num_rows()
sql count. I went with sql count so that is puts the overhead on the DB
My usual boring signature: Something
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|