|
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 12:06 AM
#1
First qualifying tournamnet. Oz won all four games scorring 66 goals and conceding none. Yet another world championship on the horizon.
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 12:16 AM
#2
PowerPoster
Give up now!
yep! Better quit while your behind all other soccer playing nations.
Against quality teams as well.
But they had a shocking half in there last game only scoring 2 times. Luckily came back to score 8 in the second!
And all you poms can do is sit there and criticise how we shouldn't score so much against these other nations and how these other nations shouldn't be playing.
ahhhh shudduuuppp!
Jealousy hurts hey!
Ohh and the glory will win the NSL grandfinal at home this time!!!!
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 12:37 AM
#3
Addicted Member
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 12:46 AM
#4
PowerPoster
aaaaaaaahahahahaha
aaaaaaaahahahahaha
hangon
a
aaaaaaaahahahahaha
[B][SIZE=4]SUCK IT DOWN
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 01:03 AM
#5
cyberwarpy
Just hoping we play England in the finals...muhhahahahahahahahahahaha
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 01:52 AM
#6
you are all unlucky countries.. never had a chance to
play against India.. you could have owned a new
record.. 50-0 or something
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 06:22 AM
#7
Is there anywhere out of europe that 'soccer' is called real name (ie. footbal) coz everyone here appears to be calling it that, and i hate the name soccer?
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 07:22 AM
#8
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 07:31 PM
#9
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 07:36 PM
#10
yes but english football was the origanal. We were calling it foorball before your country had even been discovered. Soccer is just the name america made up for us so that they could copy our name football for their rugby rip off (which is what i assume you are reffering to).
and btw, another reason is that english football is the biggest sport in the world (in terms of popularity).
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 07:55 PM
#11
PowerPoster
Re: cyberwarpy
Originally posted by Jethro
Just hoping we play England in the finals...muhhahahahahahahahahahaha
So you can get cained you mean?? GO SVEN BABY!!!!! he's Swedish but don't hold it against him
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 08:00 PM
#12
i think its good that he ist english. What i like about him (something i hav't seen b4) is that
a) He is not prejudist against small clubs. Other past manages have only considered players from "big clubs" but he ist like that. He has been considering all the clubs in the premiership. And good on him for putting chris powell in.
b) He puts a lot of effort in. I personally have seen him at loads of games coz he goes to watch as many as he can (suppose its to make up for his lack of knowledge of the english premiership).
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 08:02 PM
#13
PowerPoster
Originally posted by lord_dude
i think its good that he ist english
That's why I said
don't hold it against him
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 08:03 PM
#14
and ps Save Chip (if u dont get it dont worry)
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 08:05 PM
#15
Originally posted by chrisjk
That's why I said dont hold it against him
i know, i was just agreeing with you.
-
Apr 17th, 2001, 08:18 PM
#16
PowerPoster
Originally posted by lord_dude
and ps Save Chip (if u dont get it dont worry)
I don't get it, but I'm worried...
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 05:39 PM
#17
Originally posted by lord_dude
yes but english football was the origanal. We were calling it foorball before your country had even been discovered. Soccer is just the name america made up for us so that they could copy our name football for their rugby rip off (which is what i assume you are reffering to).
and btw, another reason is that english football is the biggest sport in the world (in terms of popularity).
A bit of confusion dude.
OK in Australia
Football = Australian Rules Football
Rugby = Rugby Union (the game they play in heaven)
League = Rugby League or Thugby
Soccer = The round ball code that a few countries play.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 05:44 PM
#18
PowerPoster
Originally posted by Jethro
Football = Australian Rules Football
Rugby = Rugby Union (the game they play in heaven)
League = Rugby League or Thugby
Soccer = The round ball code that a few countries play.
We know that, what's your point?? Lord_dude's point (as I understand it) is that everyone should call it Football because that is what it (when I say it, I mean the game we know today) was originally called. Therefore, why is it okay for other nations (i.e. Aus/US to hijack that name, give it so some completely different sport, then call Football something else (i.e. soccer)? It's not right.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 05:47 PM
#19
Originally posted by Jethro
Soccer = The round ball code that a few countries play.
Actually, "Soccer" (or football as its know everywhere in the world except us and aus) is played by far more people and in far more countries than any other sport what so ever. And i think i am right in saying that machester united are the biggest sports club in the world in most measure, eg, fans, turnover, profit, player wages etc. David Beckem earns about £60 000 a week (about $85 000 i think). Not that i am a fan of man u.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 05:49 PM
#20
Precisely. Well said chrisjk
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 05:53 PM
#21
PowerPoster
Originally posted by lord_dude
David Beckem earns about £60 000 a week (about $85 000 i think). Not that i am a fan of man u.
Would you believe premiership players are actually moaning because they don't earn half what players in Italian clubs do!?!?!?! ****ing ******s!
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 05:57 PM
#22
Originally posted by lord_dude
Precisely. Well said chrisjk
You guys don't get humour do you!
Yes every knows soccer/football is the largest sport in the world because must countries are rubbish at Rugby Union, and have to play something easy.
I was attempting to clarify the situation to Load_Dude he seemed to think that we play "American Football", and as such when Beacon mentioned "Football" he was referring to the American game.
Still if you guys want to sit around watching a game that involves almost no scoring, (except of course when Oz is dishing it up), and players going for "Academy Awards" everytime some one looks at them then thats ok.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 06:02 PM
#23
PowerPoster
Originally posted by Jethro
You guys don't get humour do you!
Well, yeah we do, but where was the humour in that??
Yes every knows soccer/football is the largest sport in the world because must countries are rubbish at Rugby Union, and have to play something easy.
I didn't disagree...
Still if you guys want to sit around watching a game that involves almost no scoring
Actually, no. I only watch England games (if any)
except of course when Oz is dishing it up
Now that was a joke right?
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 07:41 PM
#24
PowerPoster
Chrisjk:
The humour lies here: "Soccer = The round ball code that a few countries play by jethro.
"Now That was a joke right?" no oz scored 66 goals in 4 games 33 in one match. Check Jethro's first reply.
The reason why we scored so much is because our players are constantly watching a proper game were there are more than 15 goals a match. So they decided to show them up.
Yeah why do your guy's fake injuries falling over it's so weak. I'd watch a bit more if soccer involved hip&shoulders without a penalty.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 07:52 PM
#25
PowerPoster
Originally posted by Beacon
Chrisjk:The humour lies here: "Soccer = The round ball code that a few countries play by jethro.
But I never even mentioned that line!!
"Now That was a joke right?" no oz scored 66 goals in 4 games 33 in one match. Check Jethro's first reply.
Not exactly well known for your footballing skills as a nation though are you? And who were you playing? US? NZ? Malaysia? You can only say you're any good if you beat the likes of Brazil, France, Germany, Italy and England.
Why does low scoring make it any less of a "proper game"? There's much more to it. The crosses, the offensive runs, the switchbacks, the foot skill, the attempts at goal. Just because someone doesn't score every 15 seconds doesn't always make it dull. Besides, a game where people score every 15 seconds will lessen the thrill of a goal every time. Soon gets boring.
Yeah why do your guy's fake injuries falling over it's so weak.
I think you're referring to the continentals (e.g. Italy in particular. If someone shook their hand, they'd be on the floor claiming a foul. England players are respected for not making a foul from nothing more than a bit of a shove.
I'd watch a bit more if soccer involved hip&shoulders without a penalty.
Like I said last time, I hardly ever watch matches, only England ones if any.
Last edited by chrisjk; Apr 19th, 2001 at 07:55 PM.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 08:04 PM
#26
PowerPoster
chrisjk: "But I never even mentioned that line!! " Sorry
Don't be silly we played quality sides like fiji, samoa.
Derr powerhouse nations.
Scoring: I agree but it's the same for no scoring.
I sadly agree that it is skillful.
Weak, faking injuries: I dunno SBS Shows premier league and i reckon they're all the same. How about adding some grunt and full body contact. And/Or naked women!!!!
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 08:16 PM
#27
PowerPoster
Originally posted by Beacon
chrisjk: "But I never even mentioned that line!! " Sorry
I forgive you
Don't be silly we played quality sides like fiji, samoa.
Derr powerhouse nations.
Well you didn't say, but respect for beating those two. They're cool customers.
Scoring: I agree but it's the same for no scoring.
True
Weak, faking injuries: I dunno SBS Shows premier league and i reckon they're all the same.
You might think the premier league is faking, but check out the other continentals (Cameroon, Italy, Brazil even). They really pull swift ones.
How about adding some grunt and full body contact. And/Or naked women!!!!
I wouldn't want grunting, but I have to agree naked women would be good. We get the odd streaker, but usually men
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 09:21 PM
#28
Chris for your info
The mighty socceroos (OZ soccer team) totally demolished Scotland. Now l can only persume Scotland put up their women's second eleven or something.
Interesting on the subject of injecting life into sport, in the US they have an alternative league to the NFL called "Extreme Football" or something. Basically they have brought back the biffo.
You must be a real depressed guy watching England miss out on world cups
The next one is ours so you will be even more depressed.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 09:27 PM
#29
PowerPoster
Re: Chris for your info
Originally posted by Jethro
The mighty socceroos (OZ soccer team) totally demolished Scotland. Now l can only persume Scotland put up their women's second eleven or something.
Scotland are at a pretty poor standard at the moment. Old Craig Brown has some serious thinkin' to do.
You must be a real depressed guy watching England miss out on world cups
Of course it sucks. But at the moment we;re doing well under Sven. He's sorta given the players a kick up the arse and now they're romping.
The next one is ours so you will be even more depressed.
We'll see mate, we'll see.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 09:32 PM
#30
PowerPoster
And if we don't we'll come back and play a freindly against samoa.
When is the next one? Geez i hope it's an ashes year!
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 09:34 PM
#31
Sven...weird English name
Have you guys got a foreign coach or something. Well l suppose if your cricket team is made up of Aussies, Kiwis, West Indians, and South Africans then thats par ofr the course.
We tried a pommie coach, then some weirdo, and now have an Oz coach. Though he must have learnt from the English game coz he spends all his time whinging.
-
Apr 19th, 2001, 09:44 PM
#32
PowerPoster
Re: Sven...weird English name
Originally posted by Jethro
Have you guys got a foreign coach or something.
Yep, Sven is swedish.That would be Terry Venables I believe. He was England manager in 96.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|