Hi,
just added the references to a new project, and clicked on 'run' in VS2005 and it deployed the following to the emulator:- Deploying 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\SmartDevices\SDK\SQL Server\Client\v2.0\wce400\ARMV4\sql.ppc.wce4.armv4.CAB'
Deploying 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\SmartDevices\SDK\SQL Server\Client\v2.0\wce400\ARMV4\sql.dev.enu.ppc.wce4.armv4.CAB'
I then put a connection string behind a button, clicked on it, and all was sweetness and light.
When I went into 'add remove programs' on the settings>remove programs on the emulator, I saw the entries for Microsoft SQL Client there - do you see those on your emulator?
I wish I had a clear experience in troubleshooting that one - it all of a sudden started working after downloading fresh SQL stuff from MS.
We are going with plan B - which is demo how the program works on the PPC without showing them the sync back to network db today (it's in 5 hours - so not much room for error right now).
Here's what my PPC emulator program list looks like - I wonder if I've got some duplicates getting in the way?
*** Read the sticky in the DB forum about how to get your question answered quickly!! ***
Please remember to rate posts! Rate any post you find helpful - even in old threads! Use the link to the left - "Rate this Post".
Hi,
looks fine - just that you have SqlClient and SqlMobile loaded - shouldn't be a problem.
Is the emulator just failing to connect to SqlServer? Have you cradled the device (In VS2005 Tools>Device Emulator Manager). Here you can open and cradle the emulator.
I am back to having issues with this - we are trying to work up a new release of our PPC app after having it in production for a year...
Having problems opening network DB's from my laptop using the emulator. Seems that it's "only" seeing the local sql server 2005 express on the laptop - that is grabbing the connection even though we are asking to open a network DB.
Anyone else ever experience this?
Anyone know of MS acknowledging this error or releasing fixes for it?
I also re-opened this other thread - probably didn't really need to