|
-
Apr 4th, 2001, 08:40 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Banned
Or woman are stupid or man are.
...
I suppose man are the stupid ones 
-
Apr 4th, 2001, 09:12 PM
#2
Didn't understand them before marriage, after marriage twice confused
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:25 AM
#3
transcendental analytic
Or you have to be stupid enough for it work?
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 02:58 AM
#4
Fanatic Member
If we did understand them.. Or more to the point if either sex understood the other, the joy and thrill of chasing a member of the opposite sex down would not be there because it would be almost planned..... This way each person retains their own mystique and individuality and ultimately lust for and from the opposite sex (or the same - not to leave out homosexuality.).
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 03:09 AM
#5
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 03:12 AM
#6
Fanatic Member
Re: My Theory
Originally posted by simonm
Most women's brains are so flooded with hormones that it scatters their logical processes into a kalidescope of ideas that make sense only to themselves and other like minded indivuals. 
By that you mean other women and homosexual men... ?
Thats a fair point.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 04:11 AM
#7
transcendental analytic
Re: My Theory
Originally posted by simonm
Most women's brains are so flooded with hormones that it scatters their logical processes into a kalidescope of ideas that make sense only to themselves and other like minded indivuals.
Logical processes... hmm
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 09:30 AM
#8
Hyperactive Member
Just becuase men don't understand us doesn't mean we don't make sense. You are somewhat of an enigma to us at times as well.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 09:35 AM
#9
Fanatic Member
 Of course
If women are illogical, how are they ever going to understand men (Who are logical)?
There's always hormone theropy though...
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 10:00 AM
#10
Hyperactive Member
How can men be an Enigma to women.
Trust me we are thinking of the following things in more or less the following order.
Sex
Drinking with our mates
Sex
Eating (curry etc. not health food)
Sex
Sport/fast cars/tanks/blowing stuff up.
Sex
Done. The entire scope of our brains mapped out for you.
P.S. And when we are thinking about sex, yes sometimes it's with your wife/girlfriend, other times it's with her sister and/or best mate, but most of the time it's with both of yoiu at the same time
Sorry, but thats all we think about.
Now, can you map out the female mind?? I bet there isn't enough space on the server
Cheers,
SD
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 10:04 AM
#11
Addicted Member
Re: My Theory
Originally posted by simonm
Most women's brains are so flooded with hormones that it scatters their logical processes into a kalidescope of ideas that make sense only to themselves and other like minded indivuals.
At least it's our brains! I can't say so much for men. We all know what part of the male anatomy does the thinking for them!
Normal is boring...
 smh
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 10:40 AM
#12
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 10:42 AM
#13
Fanatic Member
Well we are a species designed for sex and procreation... And women want sex as much as men they just don't talk about it as much!
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 11:19 AM
#14
Fanatic Member
Correction!
And women want sex as much as men they just don't talk about it as much!
In my experience, the only time women really want sex is when they're drunk! Precisely at the time when a Man can't quite manage it! 
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 11:45 AM
#15
as far as I can figure out...I have tried to understand my wifes mind so here it goes:
1100100010010000101010110111001010010100100101111010010101001110100100101010100101001010001001010101 0111111010101010101010011010101010100010010001001010101010010100101010101100100010010000101010110111 0010100101001001011110100101010011101001001010101001010010100010010101010111111010101010101010011010 1010101000100100010010101010100101001010101011001000100100001010101101110010100101001001011110100101 0100111010010010101010010100101000100101010101111110101010101010100110101010101000100100010010101010 1001010010101010!
Understand?? ME NIETHER!
Women remember WAY to much stuff! (ok Important and unimportant stuff)
Example:
after a man gets off the phone and the woman asks..."What did they say"
the response is "Not much..just wanted to say hi"
even though the conversation was 10 minutes long.
after a woman gets off the phone (10 minutes..Hah...maybe 20 minutes minimum!) and you make the mistake of asking what did they say?
The reponse will be the ENTIRE conversation WORD FOR WORD!!! So therefore you are now stuck for the next 20 minutes (or however long the phone call lasted) listening to what was said!
ok..the other side...
A man can be flipping throught the TV stations and see a clip of a movie (maybe 3 sec. long) and tell you what movie it is...
in other words we remember ONLY the Cool Stuff!
also a man can be EASILY entertained...How about the TV agian...Flipping through stations....and see something the Discovery station...YES! ANTS! or...Cool...look at the way that asteroid's orbit is!
You will NEVER (or very rarely) catch a woman watching these.
I could go on...and...on...and...on..........
JPnyc rocks!! (Just ask him!)
If u have your answer please go to the thread tools and click "Mark Thread Resolved"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 11:56 AM
#16
transcendental analytic
has it ever occured to you that we are no different? Well in fact
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:03 PM
#17
Kedaman...you should see if you can get a clip of her just staring and blinking...
that would be really cool....(I love that av)
and I keep forgetting to ask...what is Axiom?
JPnyc rocks!! (Just ask him!)
If u have your answer please go to the thread tools and click "Mark Thread Resolved"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:04 PM
#18
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by geoff_xrx
after a man gets off the phone and the woman asks..."What did they say"
the response is "Not much..just wanted to say hi"
even though the conversation was 10 minutes long.
Case in point.
I get an e-mail from my wife's mum (on the home computer).
I tell my wife.
She says "Anything interesting in the e-mail".
My reply "Nah, just saying hi"
A few hours later she gets around to reading the e-mail.
Her mums going into hospital for a check-up and possible operation on her eye, and she might end up blind.
My reply "Whoops, oh, yeah! I forgot that bit."
SD
P.S. As it turned out her mum was fine, but I was in the dog-house.
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:07 PM
#19
Monday Morning Lunatic
In emails from my sister she writes loads and I have 2-line replies
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:10 PM
#20
Another Sore Subject:
Why can a woman say shhh or "shut up..Im watching this!" when you try to ask/say something
But i you are watching something great...she Can (and will) intereupt. BUT...if you were to say shhh or "I'm watching!" LOOK OUT you are dead meat!
grrr!
JPnyc rocks!! (Just ask him!)
If u have your answer please go to the thread tools and click "Mark Thread Resolved"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:20 PM
#21
transcendental analytic
2 line replies must be cool 
like this one
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:22 PM
#22
transcendental analytic
maybe, she doesn't show up that many times, and i'm not sure if she's going to blink then.
well geoff, why don't you act the same then?
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:23 PM
#23
Addicted Member
Originally posted by chrismitchell
Well we are a species designed for sex and procreation... And women want sex as much as men they just don't talk about it as much!
Yeah...it's true. I'll let you in on a little secret though guys.....
The more you talk about it....the less we want it. So, use reverse psychology. Don't talk about it....at all.
Normal is boring...
smh
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:23 PM
#24
transcendental analytic
And also, Axiom means truism, if that makes any sense..
I think i posted a link to a page with the whole definition somewhere
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:24 PM
#25
Addicted Member
Originally posted by geoff_xrx
as far as I can figure out...I have tried to understand my wifes mind so here it goes:
1100100010010000101010110111001010010100100101111010010101001110100100101010100101001010001001010101 0111111010101010101010011010101010100010010001001010101010010100101010101100100010010000101010110111 0010100101001001011110100101010011101001001010101001010010100010010101010111111010101010101010011010 1010101000100100010010101010100101001010101011001000100100001010101101110010100101001001011110100101 0100111010010010101010010100101000100101010101111110101010101010100110101010101000100100010010101010 1001010010101010!
You don't understand this? That's an easy one!
Normal is boring...
smh
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:25 PM
#26
transcendental analytic
Originally posted by smh
Yeah...it's true. I'll let you in on a little secret though guys.....
The more you talk about it....the less we want it. So, use reverse psychology. Don't talk about it....at all.
kindof works
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 12:30 PM
#27
transcendental analytic
makes totally sense, is she swearing?
€‰„j§”ôR¹¤J)RåWUYU$R•R5‘Pí(%½T.©RŠTýª*K‰T¥TM$T;¥¤—’Kª”"U¿ªÊª "‘*)U
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:32 PM
#28
Hyperactive Member
Well I think most men need an instruction manual. Sometimes they're impossible to understand!
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:37 PM
#29
transcendental analytic
well i'm going to write one then
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:41 PM
#30
Hyperactive Member
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:41 PM
#31
thats easy...
Step 1: Feed me!
Step 2: Put something Sexy on.
Step 3: Repeat!
JPnyc rocks!! (Just ask him!)
If u have your answer please go to the thread tools and click "Mark Thread Resolved"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:41 PM
#32
What are you talking about Nicola? FL LKAL F FLD $(# @&*JF LSL S>@@.3,jd lkjd 69..a43$$69$$%%%%%%~!@#
How could anybody not understand that?!?
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:42 PM
#33
Originally posted by geoff_xrx
thats easy...
Step 1: Feed me!
Step 2: Put something Sexy on.
Step 3: Repeat!
What about the actual sex?!? You freak 
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:43 PM
#34
transcendental analytic
STEP 3: Wait for instruction
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:43 PM
#35
Monday Morning Lunatic
Originally posted by denniswrenn
69
Everyone understands that
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:43 PM
#36
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:48 PM
#37
JPnyc rocks!! (Just ask him!)
If u have your answer please go to the thread tools and click "Mark Thread Resolved"
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:48 PM
#38
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:53 PM
#39
transcendental analytic
o
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Apr 5th, 2001, 01:55 PM
#40
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote
My Theory
