|
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 10:53 AM
#1
Re: [2.0] Abstract class must implement interface?
Just to throw a little oil on the fire, Java behaves exactly as the OP expected C# to behave. An abstract class there is under no obligation to implement all functions of all interfaces it claims to implement. If it doesn't, then further derived classes have to.
C# is merely making this requirement explicit.
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote