|
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 07:58 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
[Serious] NFS Question
Yeah, I know it should go in the General PC forum, but anyway:
Does anyone know why, when I have explicitly included ro in the /etc/fstab options, SuSE Linux 10.1 should still be mounting an NFS file system as rwxrwxrwx?
Sample /etc/fstab entry:
VB Code:
bsp27:/u2 /bsp27_u2 nfs ro,nosuid,noexec 0 0
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 08:24 AM
#2
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Try mounting the drive manually using mount from the console.
I think it would be something like... (at your own risk)
mount -t nfs -o ro bsp27:/u2 /bsp27_u2
See if that gives you the same result.
I don't live here any more.
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 08:34 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Yep, that does exactly the same thing. I also loathe you for the fact that your advice made me type "man mount"!
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 08:47 AM
#4
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
"man touch" is also most amusing.
What is the native filesystem on the drive that you are mounting? Its not NTFS by any chance is it?
I don't live here any more.
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 09:00 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Nah, it's HTFS (SCO specific file system) but it mounts with the correct options on an older redhat box which is why it puzzles me.
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 09:10 AM
#6
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Maybe the -n option may be of use (with the mount command). Other than that, this is out of my depth mate.
I don't live here any more.
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 09:37 AM
#7
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Nah, -n relates to when the fstab file is on an ro file system. Thanks for trying tho - a bit ouf of my depth too, which sucks given that I'm the sysadmin Linux file systems I'm fine with but SCO is a strange scary world with lots of badly documented stuff....
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 10:22 AM
#8
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
 Originally Posted by CyberSurfer
Yeah, I know it should go in the General PC forum, but anyway:
Does anyone know why, when I have explicitly included ro in the /etc/fstab options, SuSE Linux 10.1 should still be mounting an NFS file system as rwxrwxrwx?
Sample /etc/fstab entry:
VB Code:
bsp27:/u2 /bsp27_u2 nfs ro,nosuid,noexec 0 0
Ignore the permissions of the mount directory. Try writing to a file beneath the mount point and it should fail.
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 10:30 AM
#9
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Aha! You are in fact absolutely correct!! Well done that man! What a bloody stupid idea that is, listing a read only dir as having full permissions!!
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 01:09 PM
#10
Addicted Member
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Man, I was having the same problem just a little while ago. :P
 Originally Posted by ZaNi
On a side note, I've figured something out: IE is like life... Its a disease we all start with, and it will be fatal someday unless something drastic changes  .
Note: If I was helpful, rate me! This is a subliminal message. GET FIREFOX!
-
Aug 15th, 2006, 01:11 PM
#11
Re: [Serious] NFS Question
Is this just Need For Speed? or the New NFS Most wanted?
NFS:Carbon is coming soon!! woot!
JPnyc rocks!! (Just ask him!)
If u have your answer please go to the thread tools and click "Mark Thread Resolved"
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|